Sitting back, or leaning forward?

by on June 13, 2011 in Opinion - 718 Comments

Share

With the conclusion of the Stanley Cup Final upon us, it will soon be time for full-fledged Leafs speculation – if not already.

After hockey has clued up for another season and the draft rolls around, things really kick it up a notch in Leafs land.

From my own experience, at my previous blog, it seemed that June and July would easily ring up the most buzz (the Kaberle situation probably helped.) So before the rush, let’s try to discuss the bigger picture for Burke and the Leafs, without being too focused on one name.

What’ll it be? Patchwork, minor tinkering, or full on aggressiveness?

We’ll have to wait and see, because anyone who can pull off a trade for a 24 year old Dion Phaneuf in mid-season isn’t exactly predictable. All we can do is discuss the options in front of Burke, Nonis, and anyone else they need to have involved.

Of course the first base to cover is the elusive top line center. We’ve been talking about this for how long now? Three years – since Sundin’s departure.

The “full throttle” approach on this type of player will require one of two things; a lot of cap space, or assets in the form of young players and draft picks. The Leafs have a lot of the former, and not so much of the latter.  This isn’t to say the Leafs are bare of prospects – it simply isn’t true. But to trade one of Kadri, Colborne, or even Gardiner would put a decent dent in that pool.

The Leafs can either commit 7-8 million to a free agent (there’s only one option) or move out a top prospect, picks, and possibly an RFA (Gunnarsson.) It would be a significant deal that would change the landscape of the forward corps, and potentially the team’s plans for the future.

Flipside? Burke doesn’t go all out on a center. He makes a small upgrade and adds a Dubinsky or Weiss type of player who can tally 50 points, much like Grabovski. This leaves the team with Grabovski – (insert name) – Bozak down the middle, which is still better than just Grabovski and Bozak.

Chances are Burke considers Joffrey Lupul a top line winger. He isn’t going anywhere, unless on another purely salary-focused deal. Pushing Lupul down the depth chart gives you over 7 million on the third line with him and Colby Armstrong alone – so it’s really up in the air whether the Leafs want to upgrade in that area.

This is obviously dependent on MacArthur re-signing. Otherwise the winger situation changes. But he’ll sign, no sweat.

If the Leafs don’t want to spend any cash on the third line, with no elite center at the top of the heap, they could be in trouble.

While Burke has clung to the idea of top six – bottom six, he doesn’t seem to have the top six figured out. And if he wants to go the Weiss, Dubinsky type route, he’ll need some scoring through three lines, not two.

If the team can land a top center, then he may be able to get away with it. But another winger wouldn’t hurt, either way.

The other two holes in the lineup that everyone’s discussing are the backup goalie situation and a puck mover for the blue line at a decent price.

Goaltending has haunted the team for years, so it’s unlikely that Burke will want to go into next season with any question marks between the pipes. While Reimer seems to be the man, it’s hard to argue with the fact that there’s a chance (no matter how miniscule) that he could have been a flash in the pan to some extent.

He’ll be great again, I believe. But expect his numbers to show he’s at least human in his sophomore campaign. And then again, there’s a chance he could get injured.

Enter Gustavsson – the prime candidate for a bounce-back season. I mean, things couldn’t get much worse, could they?

Considering Wilson will likely push Reimer to 60 games or so (Cam Ward logged 74 this past season), the Monster only has to worry about 20-25. If he fails miserably, the Leafs could always hand a few games to another up and comer like Rynnas or Scrivens.

Training camp is really the place to sort this type of thing out, so maybe Burke will hold off on signing another tender until the very late stages of the offseason, and may not even bother. I’d personally like to see one of the guys in the organization make the jump, but we’ll see what happens.

And finally, Burke will try to add a defenceman who can handle the puck. This will almost certainly come by way of free agency, unless he entertains another potential deal for J.M. Liles (unlikely.)

This one is a little tricky. There’s affordable, like Ian White. And there’s not so affordable, like Wisniewski, Ehrhoff, Bieksa, or Pitkanen.

At first I thought the Leafs would play it safe on this one, and not get into anything serious – adding a guy for 3 million or so. But Burke really doesn’t like to mess around when it comes to defenceman, so I could see him surprising a lot of people (myself included) with a big name signing here. I’m not sure if it’s the smartest move, but this is one area where I think it’s particularly tough to predict what he’s looking into.

It’ll be interesting to see what pans out in the coming weeks, but you can be sure that Burke will pull a major deal. Actually, no, you can’t be sure. I really have no idea what he’s going to do.

But whether it’s all or nothing, I’m trying to prepare myself the best I can.

Email ryan[email protected] and follow on twitter/maplestirup

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • leafs_regimeofburke_

    Kessel is the bomb!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kessel gets 40
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djstml
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djstml

    anyways folks, i’m out. later days

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kostas

    @kessel gets 40

    Lombardi is notorious for not spending money. I read some where recently that he was fired once upon a time from his GM duty in San Jose because he tried to low ball too many players and made things worse for the organization.
    -
    He’s doing the same thing in LA now… Not willing to spend some extra cash or assets to put LA into that group of teams that are competing for the cup.
    -
    Most surprisingly though is the LA fans verbal abuse on Drew Doughty. Calling him fat ass and even asking him if he’s ever seen the inside of the gym before. Add to this that his GM calls him out in the media… stating that Drew Doughty is, “Lazy and needs to get into shape.” and now I can understand why he hasn’t resigned.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nazem.K-savzri

    Kostas wrote:

    anybody here think that if Boston still had Kessel that they would have won the cup now? He could have scored some goals in those close games in Vancouver earlier on in the series.

    Said the same thing earlier to my dad. Kessel knows how to light Luongo up good too. Just look at our games this year. Dude has his number with that shot. Fawk, i love Kessel! His speed, that shot, his underrated passing, the guy is money, and in the toughest market in hockey to boot. Once he has another offensive cog to play with, he won’t be expected to carry so much. Even if he still scores the same amount, we’ll see how much his scoring matters when the playoffs hit, next to a guy that can set him up. No doubt in my mind this kid was built for pressure, as he puts enough on himself day in day out. He thrives on it, shy or not.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mislav Jantoljak

    Supposedly, we have re-signed Gunnarsson on a 2 year deal. Not really sure about this one, could be a dud. Wait for news.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nazem.K-savzri

    Mislav Jantoljak wrote:

    Supposedly, we have re-signed Gunnarsson on a 2 year deal. Not really sure about this one, could be a dud. Wait for news.

    Definitely isn’t a dud. He could easily become very effective once he adds size to that frame. Not only will that make him better 1 on 1 in the corners, but it would add a dynamic to his offensive game via shot. He already has the accuracy and decent passing and always finds the seams in screens. Its just a matter of believing in himself which is contagious amongst a young group like ours.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mislav Jantoljak
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Stanley goes to White Kessel

    avatar check…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Zep

    Mislav Jantoljak wrote:

    Supposedly, we have re-signed Gunnarsson on a 2 year deal. Not really sure about this one, could be a dud. Wait for news.

    Good news if its true. John Fergusons horrible tenure as Leaf Gm is mitigated by some awful good drafting outside the 1st round.
    Reimer, Kulie, Gunnarson

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mislav Jantoljak

    Zep wrote:

    Mislav Jantoljak wrote:
    Supposedly, we have re-signed Gunnarsson on a 2 year deal. Not really sure about this one, could be a dud. Wait for news.
    Good news if its true. John Fergusons horrible tenure as Leaf Gm is mitigated by some awful good drafting outside the 1st round.
    Reimer, Kulie, Gunnarson

    I sure hope it’s true, my friend read it in a Swedish newspaper. I’m not one to post rumors but this seems legit. No news on the contract value, it’s a one way contract.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • schennation

    @ Mislav Jantoljak:

    Two years is good number, possibly $1.75 per? This will give Gunner a chance to break out over that time and then get a much bigger payday on his next contract.

    Do you feel his defensive game is good enough to withstand the rigors of playoff hockey?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • schennation

    @ kessel gets 40:

    Of course, I’d be all over signing Drew at $7ish mil and giving up the 2 1sts and the 2nd. A top 4 of Dion, Aulie, Schenn, and Doughty would be beyond epic. But I highly doubt LA would let him go for just picks.

    A Stamkos/Doughty+ deal has a lot of sexyness to it. Possibility?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mislav Jantoljak

    schennation wrote:

    @ Mislav Jantoljak:
    Two years is good number, possibly $1.75 per? This will give Gunner a chance to break out over that time and then get a much bigger payday on his next contract.
    Do you feel his defensive game is good enough to withstand the rigors of playoff hockey?

    New topic – yeah, I think the more he matures he’ll be even better defensively, has to get better offensively and improve on bringing the puck up ice since he’s not your prototypical shutdown defenseman.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nazem.K-savzri
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mislav Jantoljak
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BloodonIce
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)