Filling out, rounding Up(shall)

by on June 27, 2011 in Free Agency - 936 Comments

Share

Photo Credit: sportsnet.ca

What a terrible title, no? I don’t care, I’m going with it.

With the NHL free agency period finally arriving this coming Friday, the list of needs for the Maple Leafs isn’t too extensive. But the routes available almost seem endless.

While we anxiously await Brian Burke‘s solution to the team’s top line problem, it may be smart to explore some contingency plans. One of which is simply upgrading at the forward position in any way shape or form.

Something that Burke made clear upon his arrival in the hockey mecca, is that he likes to put forward a team formed with top six, bottom six group of players up front. What this basically translates into is a team with skill on the top two lines, and pugnacity (or whatever the hell Burke is talking about) on the bottom two lines.

The only trouble with the Leafs thus far is that Burke hasn’t established enough talent on the top two lines to warrant throwing a bunch of dusters on the ice with the other two. And without addressing this issue in a big way over the coming weeks, the Leafs may have to employ a different mentality going into next season.

Of course a big trade or signing (or two) could completely turn this around, but it’s better to be prepared for the worst.

If Toronto want to ice a team without a major scorer on the top line (besides Kessel), it might be in Burke’s best interest to round out the top nine forwards with as much talent as possible.

It goes without saying that the top of the list for this team’s needs is not another 40 point scorer. But without any real elite scoring help, Burke may want to take a look at rolling out three lines that can effectively put the puck in the net.

Is it the ideal? Nope. But it’s better than the sinkhole the Leafs have found themselves in for the past two seasons.

Going about this is the tough part. How do you fill the gaps? There are probably a few guys out there worth signing that could chip in 30-40 points on the third line, and those are essentially the types of players you’d have to look for.

Mislav mentioned Maxime Talbot this morning. A twenty-five point scorer, he can bring it on the third and fourth lines, while also adding some character to the dressing room. Though, with the terrible UFA market he may command a little too much salary for such an unskilled player.

I’m thinking a little bit more in the ways of scoring, like Scottie Upshall.

Again, the overpayment in salary may not be worth it. But he’s probably worth throwing an offer at.

Upshall is a career 0.48 point per game player, isn’t afraid of the physical game, and can be a bit of an agitator from what I’ve read.

Of course, like Talbot, the same rules apply in terms of potentially inflated salary. With the weak UFA crop and the cap floor being the new topic of discussion, teams may be willing to throw a few extra bucks his way. And for that reason it’s tough to predict what kind of salary he’ll be looking for.

Coming off a season that seen his production take a dip, Upshall just made 2.25 million against the cap. Even with the decrease in points, he’ll likely still see an increase.

If the Leafs do in fact go the route of rounding out a better group of forwards through three lines, they would also need a center to push Bozak down to becoming third on the depth chart. This is where the Laich debate probably comes back on to the scene.

But there are options outside of overpaying a guy like Laich (Laich Laich?) to become a top two center.

Dubinsky and Weiss are names that will never go away until the Leafs figure out what they’re doing up front. And if a player like that was brought in to the fold, the team could ice a solid group of forwards that are quite versatile.

This is another one of those ideas where you can really just find a comparable to Upshall that you happen to like and plug in the name. But rolling out three lines with an ample amount of skill seems like a viable option if Burke fails in bringing in the big name that everyone wants.

Do I personally think the Leafs will need to explore this type of route? I’m not sure, at all. The whole Richards thing is starting to wear on me, and I’m beginning to lean more toward the epic blockbuster trade idea if anything worthwhile is going to happen.

Otherwise the team should try and fill out the lineup in the best way possible, and provide some scoring depth if the big name signing/trade doesn’t come to fruition. It’s something that I’ve discussed a few times with the folks on twitter, specifically 67sound, among others.

Even with a big name coming into the fold, at a reasonable cap hit, a player like Upshall could fit into the lineup regardless. If he commands too much? Walk away.

A move like this doesn’t ensure a playoff spot for the Leafs by any means. But any improvement at this point is welcome, and Burke should be at least looking for help in any way he can.

The “top six, bottom six” idea doesn’t work unless you have a real top six. So maybe it’s time for a “top nine, bottom three” mentality if the Leafs want to give themselves the best chance at achieving anything next season.

Email [email protected] and follow on twitter/maplestirup

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    Based on the ones BurtonBoy and Rusty post, this looks false. But if he chooses the Rags, I have faith that Burkie-Nonis-Dudley will come up with a good alternative. If we miss the playoffs again this year, but keep our players, and they play their butts off in an entertaining fashion, I’m good. I just want Phil The Thrill to have a really complimentary Center.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Stamkos offer sheet, here we come

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    Then peace. This has dragged out for so long I’ve lost interest. Truth be told I want Eric Staal. Statsny would be great but will Colarado will play hardball and look to get an arm and a leg. I trust Burkie, so I will sleep well tonight.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DWC

    Schenn should get a contract like this: 5 years, $16 million. That’s $3.2 million per year, a reasonable amount for both sides. It is also the longest possible deal we could give Schenn so that he is still an RFA upon its expiration. I would have no problem seeing him receive a full NMC as part of this contract, but only if that’s what it takes to get him to sign it.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    We need a Center first. Stamkos and 4 firsts, I would much rather Tavares.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Why Tavares over Stamkos?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Fuck Incarcerated Bob!!!

    Is he not the guy that said Richards’ rights to the Leafs was a done deal and that Carter to the Leafs was all but done??

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Why does everybody say the Rangers don’t have the Cap Space to sign Richards??

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    Hard to explain. From what I’ve seen he doesn’t need a St. Louis, and he makes everyone around him much better.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    They have a bout $22 million in Cap Space, with Callahan and Dubinsky being the only big name Free Agents they have have to resign.

    Lets assume each of them get a $4 million deal and each of Ansimov and Boyle get $2 million, they still have 12 million left to sign Richards and 2 defencemen.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Exactly why I’m skeptical.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    the increase in cap bailed out a lot of teams, that just sucks for the leafs

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    I kind of figured that was what you were thinking, and I see your point. Stamkos has his good points too. I think the Isles would match any offer, whereas with TB, I could see them taking a pkg or the picks. They lost big money last year and have alot of big tickets already.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DWC
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Josh

    http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/rangers/that_rich_CI52HqURuVUZeUKxfbGi1O
    :(

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Saw that article earlier in the day. Just days early, Brooksy was saying that the Rangers were behind the Leafs in the running. Things either changed quickly or Brooksy knows shit. I don’t doubt that the Rangers are in Richards’ top 3 picks however.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Josh
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Josh
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)