Morning Mashup: All Quiet on the Western Front

by on October 12, 2011 in Leafs News - 424 Comments

Share

Photo: Nathan Denette/Canadian Press

True to form, the Leafs have found a way to disappoint, this time it’s the media falling victim to the “surprisingly” unbeaten Leafs.  For a team surrounded by questions October 6, their critics have been mum about the club during this early, extended respite.  With four days remaining on the sojourn, the only real news of import is that Tim Connolly is doubtful to play and that Cody Franson will finally draw into the line up.

Quite simply, it’s like there’s nothing much to talk about.  Or rather, there’s no pot to stir.  There are the inevitable and inescapable roster questions.  However there’s no immediacy or concern, either temporally or in the standings.  This reprieve from the 82 game grind has granted an amnesty to the franchise.  But eventually the rubber will meet the road, so let’s take a look at some of the more compelling questions facing the Toronto Maple Leafs.

The first roster question simmering away quietly is: who will sit for Cody Franson?  Ron Wilson, never one to shy away from making personal observations about the faults of players he intends to sit, has been quite tightlipped about the matter.

Whether it is Gunnarsson, Gardiner or Komisarek (it’s a safe bet that Wilson won’t bench Phaneuf, Liles or Schenn unless one of the three is banged up), there’s no games for the bubble players to prove themselves.  This lack of transparency on the matter seems both useless and detrimental to the club.

Another concern is how frequently will Franson be inserted into the line up?  Much like bevy of 3rd/4th line forwards haunting the club, depth on D is immense.  For a guy who put up decent numbers on a conference semifinalist last season, it must come as some snub to sit in the press box for a 10th place team.

A bigger question is how much ice will young Cody even get to see?  With the top 4 all capable of 22+ minutes, the defensively weak Franson might not get a chance to play meaningful minutes even if he does make it onto the game day roster for 70+ games this season.

To clarify: this is not to suggest that Franson should be given undue gifts, rather an expression of concern over someone who might not get a break regardless of his play.

Strange as it seems, Franson and fellow Preds alum Matthew Lombardi seem to be on opposite trajectories.  In July, Franson was certain and Lombardi a question.  Now, Lombardi is figuring to be the exact type of 2 way centre the third line needs, whereas Franson has become an afterthought.

The other absent presence is that of free agent signing Tim Connolly brought in to anchor the first line and provide Phil Kessel with a true passer.  This time was meant for him to mend, to be ready for game 3.  With that no longer the case, the plot thickens.

Connolly’s injuries – one might prognosticate – will be the fuel of much roster speculation throughout the season, if only because it seems he will be on the IR for a while and frequently.  What no one seems to be asking loud enough or persistently enough is the extent or severity of this injury.  He’s set to miss an October 15 game after sustaining the injury on September 26th.  That’s almost three weeks.

While he’s been able to keep practicing with the team to keep his sea legs, he hasn’t yet been cleared for contact and he hasn’t seemed at all anxious about an extended delay in debut.  Perhaps what is most frustrating is the liminality of the whole situation.  The lack of information on the injury forces mild speculation, but begs for clarification before anything else is said.

In that sense GM Brian Burke has sheltered Connolly from the hottest glare of the spotlight, forcing the masses to wait before passing judgment.  However, as time creeps on, Connolly must face the public.  People will become less endeared to him if his whisper quiet IR stint lasts a month or more.

Indeed, for a team that came into the season with more questions than a quiz book, the $64,000 question remaining is “When will we see Tim Connolly, prize acquisition of free agency, in a regular season game?”

Thank you for reading, and as always, onto the links.

****

LEAFS LINKS

Its only Wednesday, but Connolly is already doubtful for this weekend’s tilt.  I guess you get what you pay for, eh Brian?

Murkiest forward corps in the league? Who cares we’re undefeated.

Jonas Siegel on David Steckel’s opportunity in Toronto.

Declassified report about the Leafs from CFB Trenton.

An interesting piece on Lombardi, his past injury, his optimism moving forward, and thoughts of a repentant GM.

McKegg making headlines.  Seriously, he had 6 primary assists in that one game.  Also, further communication from the trenches.

DGB looks around the league.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Anonymous

    I think moving a D-man right now or anytime soon doesn’t really make sense anyway. Leafs should just send Gards down, barring a surprising turn around in play, put Franson in the line-up and run with 6D. If someone gets hurt you just call someone up on injury re-call.

    I’m more interested in what’s going to happen with this re-alignment. So many options.

    http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=377916#YourCallTop

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Thats what I would believe.. I mean their top 3 centre spots would be locked up for some time…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/rickpearce76 Rick Pearce

    You have a point that he put up points on a terrible blue jackets team. Maybe the guy is legit. I don’t see him as easily a 30 goal guy but maybe.

    There’s an equal chance that he got those points just because someone has to. Maybe being the best guy on a shitty team does not mean you can put up bigger points on a better team. We saw Stajan put up over 50 pts a few years ago here, we saw Versteeg produce at a similar level to what he had in Chicago when we expected him to rip it up here.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron

    The one that makes the most sense to me right now is moving VAN into the Pacific, DAL into Central, WPG into the North East, and DET into the East.
    -
    WPG, MIN, COL, EDM, CGY
    -
    VAN, SJS, ANA, LAK, PHX
    -
    CHI, DAL, NSH, CLB, STL

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    Burke is the type of GM that would give them proper value in return. Some GMs might try to put them over the barrel but Burke will be reasonable. Not suggesting he even wants Turris but who knows…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron

    I think he’s said he would never acquire a player who’s demanded a trade, because as logic goes, if he would do it to someone else, he’d do it to you too

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/rickpearce76 Rick Pearce

    I am not saying he’s terrible. I’m saying I don’t necessarily buy into your theory that he is easily a 30 goal scorer.

    Also, the thing is I don’t see how this guy is going to do anything to improve our team. He’d fit in on the 3rd line where we already have Frattin/Kadri/Lombardi fighting for a spot. It just doesn’t make sense to me.

    This guy is not better than anyone in our top 6. I really believe any deal we do for a forward is going to bring in someone who could be our best forward.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/rickpearce76 Rick Pearce

    I remember him saying that too, but then I wondered about the Kessel situation. Maybe Kessel never outright asked for a trade but it did not seem like he had any plans on staying in Boston…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Wild clearing space!? lol.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    There’s an exception to every rule ;) I’m not sure I’d want him but truth is I don’t know enough about him…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan

    If Burke’s looking at Philly then imo the targets are: Hartnell, Schenn, Giroux (Don’t think this one’s possible at all but stranger things have happened)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron

    well Dallas is back over the cap again I assume

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Thats exactly why they traded for him instead of claiming on recall waivers.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    i didnt think he played with nash,,,,,,,,,,,i thought umberger and brassard played with nash, and voracek played with umberger

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    ok, let me re-phrase,,,he could crack the 30 goal barrier…..;)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)