Morning Mashup: Ghostly Grabovski?

by on October 18, 2011 in Leafs News - 581 Comments

Share

Photo - Mike Cassese/Reuters

As one of the premiere pressure cookers of the sporting world, the media in Toronto are experts at bouncing between athletes to question and criticize.  Phil Kessel‘s the first star of the week and leading the league in most offensive categories?  Sure, they’ll back off the Thrill, with some insidiously mumbled warnings that a slump is impending.  Phaneuf is playing like a captain, and an elite defender?  Fine, they’ll throw us a bone every now and then.  But hey, how about that Grabovski line?  Then the finger-wagging about depth and consistency begins as one of the league’s best lines from last year has not yet found their stride.  Although they were getting it done in the preseason, it’s really not surprising that Toronto’s number one line is slow out of the gates.

For starters, Clark MacArthur was thrown out of the loop with his short suspension, disrupting the chemistry the line was establishing in exhibition games.  Yet while Nikolai Kulemin‘s best outing thus far was last night against Colorado, the Russian winger’s game shows the least variance of the three.   As such, the engine that drives this trio truly is Mikhail Grabovski, with his multifaceted role as the distributing pivot, speedy puck carrier and offensively-creative wizardry.  It’s also Grabovski’s tendency for ugly Octobers that renders their lack of excellence (for they have not been awful by any stretch of the imagination) unsurprising.  Last season, the Belarussian had just 4 points (all assists) in 10 October games.  The first 10 games of November 2010 then saw him tear it up to the tune of 12 points (5 G, 7 A).  His previous full season with Toronto (in 2008-2009)?  2 points in 10 October games.  Then, with a beastly surge that I can only assume arises from a Halloween candy overdose, Grabovski once again rang up 12 points in the first 10 games of November.

As much as we wish all of our players operated at their best over the course of a full season, the reality is that only the superstars out there can accomplish this feat.  Grabovski, for whatever reason, wakes up on November 1st and starts playing the type of hockey that made him a fixture on highlight reels last season.  It may arise from early-season jitters: overthinking the game, rather than relying on more aggressive, baser instincts.  This was on display during last night’s game, as Mikhail elected to pass off some opportunities that he shouldn’t have.  This is also reflected in Grabovski’s shot totals, which have been nonexistent in the last few games, a far cry from what amounted to a 3 shots per game average in 2010-2011.  With all of this in mind, there’s no doubt that this line will set the record straight in due  time.  Hopefully it won’t take until November this year, but the hard work and determination that made this trio successful is still their defining strength and the trait that will have all three filling up the scoresheet in weeks to come.

LEAFS LINKS

Mislav’s game in 10

Giggy schooled Reimer

The Leafs were not at their best last night

Balance will lead to success

All the things currently wrong with Toronto

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • light’em up

    I was thinking more of a 3rd liner that could play spot duty in top 6.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    I’d do it in a heartbeat

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Knights2Leafs
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • light’em up

    It could be a highly sought after development. They could become the next internet billionaires.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan

    I found it was easier to convey emotions when there were emoticons, not just :)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Canucksnaphook
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    dude, you make insults all the time when you are questioned…….im tired of the insults…..i listened to a crediable source who stated why nash didnt sign with the leafs..and then you come back with im wrong cause u heard nash say many times………( i gues a player always tells the truth) .you like confrontation which is fine,, but if you are actually an adult, then you should stop with the insults to many posts on here who have an opinion you dont agree with….you come across as a know it all whos never wrong,,,,,,,you have some very good insights on the game, however when your an ass to people it makes you look foolish….,,,,

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    we have way too many of those already and he is also a liability with the refs IMO

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    yeah caps doesnt mean shouting!!!!! its trying to make a point in bold caps……….

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Knights2Leafs
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • light’em up

    Definitely not saying I want him here. LOL
    I would think he would be like Armstrong is for us. 3rd line guy that you could put up here and there if you had to. I agree we are full on that requirement for now.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    im watching the columbus/dallas game,,,,,and my gawd are the bj awful…….lol they just scored on the pp.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • light’em up
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    well one thing we tend to agree on is we both think eachother is wrong,,,,,,oh well,,,,

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Just look at T bays defensive woes and I would wonder if another swede would interest them.

    To Tampa: Carl Gunnarson, 2013 6th

    To Tor: Brett Connolly

    Connolly provides us with another quality center/rw prospect, high ceiling and not far off from being NHL ready.

    Pick it apart!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whalz

    also, i guess i need to take your comments with a grain of salt, you come off arrogant sometimes (like you have a split personality) and maybe its not your intention.,,,,,,cheers.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Knights2Leafs

    Are any of them NHL calibre?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Whitney?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)