Game In 10: Game 16, Leafs at Blues

by on November 10, 2011 in Uncategorized - 261 Comments

Game In 10: Game 16, Leafs at Blues
Share

On a night where the coaching staff virtually put all our hopes (until Reimer comes back) in the hands of a rookie rather than our backup netminder, things seemed rather bleak. However, the outcome proved quite to the contrary as Scrivens was the key to a big win tonight. The Leafs needed this one.

1 – The Leafs are 10-5-1 and some progress was made tonight. The win is sweet, but the Blues once again showed us we need to keep working on a lot of stuff.

2 – We didn’t look good early, got beaten along the boards, made bad zone entries, and had little presence in the offensive zone. All that changed as the period moved along.

3 – Hitchcock put pressure in the neutral zone as a response to our big number of turnovers in that area of the ice. It worked early as almost all the chances the Blues created in the first came from our turnovers in the neutral zone. However, the Leafs found rhythm later in the period and ended up outchancing and outscoring the Blues by the end of the first. Our three powerplays didn’t help their cause either.

4 – JM Liles was left wide open on the PP, he calmly kicked the puck to his stick and scored a pretty good stick side low shot on Jaroslav Halak.

5 – Phil Kessel scored our 2nd PP goal of the period after Halak failed to control the rebound in front. He is in some form this guy. On a side note, the refs let a LOT go (the Blues benefited more). The second period wasn’t as much about the Blues pressuring the neutral zone as it was them outworking us along the boards and down low.

6 – Our penalty kill worked until it didn’t. It took the second zone entry on their 2nd powerplay and just like that the Blues cut the lead to 1. Still, a big kill towards the end of the period and another huge one at the end of the third so I’d say we can’t complain.

7 – I rarely talk about the opposing players in my Game In 10s but man, Alex Pietrangelo is such a good defenseman already. He’s also an example of a player that was patiently and properly developed. Back to the Leafs, we were really good in the faceoff circle. Bozak was particularly impressive winning 12 out of 15. A ton of shots blocked, as well.

8 – What a pokecheck by Scrivens early in the 2nd period, he looked like a fisherman throwing a line, ssssssssswhish (that’s the sound of a fisherman throwing a line). He also made a GIGANTIC save on Steen, who seemed to have a wide open net. Then he stymied Backes up close. A really big game by the kid in a high pressure situation. The Scrivenator? Oh yeah.

9 – A surprisingly efficient defense tonight. Not saying it was picture perfect but a lot of good sticks, the D played the body, some solid defensive coverage. When present, backchecking was also a big factor. But, their forecheck created big problems for us in the third period and we spend most of it stuck in our own zone without a hope of getting out.

10 – Even though we played better defensively, we still allowed the Blues to pressure in our zone and get a big number of shots in (30-8 in the Blues’ favour in the 2nd and 3rd periods). Without Connolly, Armstrong and Reimer I’m guessing we should take the win and the positives that go with it, learn from our mistakes and keep grinding it out.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Dannyrobes

    Nash – Staal – Kessel

    Leafs win the cup.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • AsburyJukes
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    If a kid who grew up in Brampton chose Montreal over the Leafs I would puke my brains out.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Komas Taberle

    Stall is messed up because of his hit on his brother, he will turn it around.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    A former offensive 2nd line center that changed his game at Burns’ (RIP) request and dominated as a 3rd/4th line center for a handful of years.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie sucks

    I loved the BOZ line. Corson-Green-Tucker were a fine 3rd line for a season or 2 as well.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie sucks

    Staal is clutch in the playoffs.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    I loved that team. Roberts, Corson, Green, Tucker, Domi, Belak and Quinn behind the bench…That Islanders series was unbelievable! Roberts running Kenny Jonsson from behind into the boards. 20 game suspension today lol

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    First of all I think Nash is a good player. Stall has won a cup, and he carried the mail. Also Staal has more edge to his game. When you get down to that game seven in a big series I would way rather go to battle with E Staal.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie sucks

    Although both were excellent at the olympics. Actually, I’d take any forward off that team.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dkl001
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Just going to put this out there. Last year Nash 91 htis in 75 games, Staal 81 in 81. Staal takes more bad penalties than Nash though. Rick Nash 5 career fights, Eric Staal 1.
    .
    Nash plays a harder game than Staal does. But neither is that dominating physical player that some people think they are. Just trying to clarify.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Just going to put this out there. Last year Nash 91 htis in 75 games, Staal 81 in 81. Staal takes more bad penalties than Nash though. Rick Nash 5 career fights, Eric Staal 1.
    .
    Nash plays a harder game than Staal does. But neither is that dominating physical player that some people think they are. Just trying to clarify.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    Moi_Moi don’t we need a true #1 Center. Nash = wing= Kessel does not max his potential????

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    Moi_Moi don’t we need a true #1 Center. Nash = wing= Kessel does not max his potential????

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron

    Nash is like Ryan Malone in that even though he’s big, he can be pushed off the puck, or knocked off his feet.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron

    Nash is like Ryan Malone in that even though he’s big, he can be pushed off the puck, or knocked off his feet.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    This!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)