Morning Mashup: Sound Of The Gun

by on November 14, 2011 in Leafs News - 395 Comments

Share

Photo: Abelimages/Getty Images

I once got a tip from a guy who worked in hockey. He said that the less you hear about a defenseman during a game of hockey, the more probable it is that he’s playing a very sound hockey game.

Carl Gunnarsson just might be the posterboy for this notion. You rarely hear “Big hit by Carl Gunarsson”. Then again, color commentary is rarely about “Gunnarsson moved the puck quickly and efficiently out of danger on that occasion.”

There is a reason behind why teams would a) want Gunnarsson in a package deal, b) why I thought/think he will probably be a part of a package deal. That reason has nothing to do with me wanting him out of the hockey club (nothing could be further from the truth) and everything to do with the fact he could actually add real value to the trade package. Now, for a guy selected 194th overall, who was never really projected as something special by anyone but the guy who recommended him to the Leafs (much like Sondre Olden), that’s quite a step forward.

The more I think about it, the less I would be prepared to agree with us moving Carl Gunnarsson, although all that depends on the return. Why? Well, simply put, he is our best defenseman. While this may come as a surprise, it’s the truth. Looking purely from a defensive standpoint, his defensive coverage, lack of turnovers and hockey IQ are the highest among our current group of defensemen. Gardiner is slowly getting there, but as things stand now, Gunnarsson is the guy I trust to get the puck out of the zone with little pizzazz and great efficiency. Carl plays a strong positional game and never tries to do too much, instead he plays the simple game to perfection. The one thing I’ve noticed about this guy is his consistency on a game to game basis.  I also really like his composure, which is coupled with good on-ice vision. Like many Swedes before him, he just seems to play a level way beyond his draft position.

I haven’t observed many holes in his game since his rookie year, and judging by his maturation he will continue to improve at this level. The one thing I would like to see is him working on his upper body strength in order to handle the bigger forwards a little bit better. To tell you the truth, with the way our defense handles breakout passes and coughs up the puck in our own zone, Gunnarsson is the last defenseman the club should be moving. He’s just so… stabile.

LEAF LINKS:

Before I Made It – Carl Gunnarsson, by THN

Slumping Leafs Lack That Killer Instinct, by James Mirtle

Is it wrong for the media to contact a player’s family? By VLM

Where Has Kulemin Gone? by Steve Burtch over at PPP

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • whalz

    im sure the leafs will get even with gionta soon enough….,or atleast have alot of traffic infront of price and see what happens.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Blake being out for so long is probably one reason they claimed Hagman

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • whalz

    ducks are struggling, needed to do something,…..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    No kidding but the Blake injury makes it a total no brainer. Mislav should be happy , I think Hagman is gonna do well with him and Koivu.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wendelsway

    I’d like to think they will……but I thought somebody would have taken a shot at him when Reimer was laying on the ice….didn’t happen

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ensign
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • whalz

    its all about smoke and mirrors………..next time buff plays boston all eyes will be looking at retaliation because of all the smash talking etc………leafs will pick their spots…..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wendelsway
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • whalz

    i agree with you,,,,,,im not saying gionta will be a target, but he, price or subban better be aware..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    thats part of what Howe said on saturday. Players looking for the refs to control things and confused about whether to retaliate or not. Don’t think they realized that Reimer was hurt either. In terms of Gionta if you do the deed gotta pay the price whether that game or later.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    Lucic got a penalty, which is all he should get. Miller should get suspended for an attempt to injure after swinging his stick like a maniac

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron

    agreed…eye for an eye

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Shotgun Charlie

    I just wanna say….. Everyone is talking about the leafs going 1-3 in the last 4 games. It is their first slump of the year, Why aren’t we talking about 3-3 for the last 6 games? Regardless who the wins are against, Columbus and New Jersey are still NHL teams. If we lost those games it would be far worse.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    Lucic got a penalty, which is all he should get

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wendelsway

    That is what I assumed as I do think this bunch will stick up for one another and are a tight knit group

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • whalz
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    We can agree to disagree on this. guess he won’t have a linesman to hide behind on this one.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wendelsway

    Somebody please tell Grabo……more shooting, less passing….just sayin’

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wendelsway

    Somebody please tell Grabo……more shooting, less passing….just sayin’

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    Howe was bang on in his comments. Back then you didn’t get guys hiding behind the officials or the rulebook . Game was way better in the 80s and early 90′s pre trap hockey was the best

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    You’d think they’d have a stool or a phone book around in case Bettman dropped by.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    You’d think they’d have a stool or a phone book around in case Bettman dropped by.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron

    that’s what I’m saying hahaha

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)