Game In 10: Game 26, Leafs at Bruins

by on December 3, 2011 in Uncategorized - 797 Comments

Game In 10: Game 26, Leafs at Bruins
Share

Another game against the Bruins, another night of same olds. Next game against the Bs is March 6th, 2012, so this was a last chance in a long time to make an impression in what is fast becoming a really ugly two player rivalry. James Reimer returned, which given his record against the Bruins made perfect sense. The HNIC commentators would have you believe Chara is a mammoth shutdown angel on skates and Boston can improve fertility with their systems play.

1 – The Leafs are 14-10-2 and congratulations Bruins, nothing else to say really. It is frustrating but sometimes you just gotta shake their hand and say it – Boston: You’re a better team right now. Outscored us 23-6 in the last four games.

2 – Game started out with a really good pace in the first period, but other than us keeping pace with the Bruins, it was much of the same – a lot of turnovers and Bruins generating chances from those turnovers and off the cycle. We had virtually no offensive zone time but did play solid defense in the first period.

3 – The first Bruins goal was a typical example of one thing Boudreau spoke about in the latest THN issue. Good puck movement by the Bruins, we were caught of out position and it’s 1-0 Bruins from a Krejci stick. We also turned it over after having possession on the wall. The second goal was an example of the Leafs running around in our own zone. The third… ah you get the picture.

4 – We got a goal from a nothing play, Gardiner danced the blueline, lost the puck and it trickled down to Grabo who fires a one timer and beats Rask from a tough angle. Goodto see him scoring again. It was his 2nd goal in two games.

5 – Kulemin didn’t play a really impressive game, didn’t handle the puck well and made some questionable decisions in the offensive zone, 18 games without lighting the lamp. Hope you make it through this kid, you certainly have the skills.

6 – Our powerplay didn’t look like one of the league’s best powerplays tonight which ALWAYS costs you against top tier teams.

7 – James Reimer didn’t miss a beat… glad to have you back Optimus. Crabb played a good game too.

8 – Phil Kessel played his 400th NHL game tonight, congratulations Mr. Franchise, but this wasn’t one of your more memorable games.

9 – You can’t control the bounces, you can’t control your size, but you can control how much and how hard you work. The Leafs worked hard, but fact is besides the Bruins being a team we always have trouble matching up against, for most of the game, Boston outworked us. Our players should learn from this.

9b – Another game against the Bruins, another game which raises the question – where’s the truculence? Literally no team can match Boston’s physicality, and we miss Armstrong and Brown sorely in this regard, but you’d hope to see a little more fight out of the Leafs as a whole. Again the Bruins were successful in making the Leafs’ top guns non factors. Kessel, Lupul, and Connolly were hardly involved tonight.

10 – It’s not just the Leafs. The Bruins are Stanley Cup champions and have won 13 out of their last 14 games now. Think about that. Then think about the improvement our team made in order to play close games with such a team. However, there’s no denying they are a better team than us right now and it shows. Boy does it show. Good news, we play them only 2 more times this year. Yay.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Wilbur
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron

    lol, yep, my bad.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    I wouldn’t want him to not be able to find it on dictionary.com…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wiski

    It’s a queer sensation, this secret belief that one stands on the brink of the world’s greatest catastrophe. For it means the fall of Western Europe, as it fell in the fourth century. It recurs to me every November, and culminates every December. I have to get over it as I can, and hide, for fear of being sent to an asylum
    Not to bad eh?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wiski

    Only crime and the criminal, it is true, confront us with the perplexity of radical evil; but only the hypocrite is really rotten to to the core.

    Hannah Arendt

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Well, they fucked up and are playing the Houston game again :(
    So, it’s off to theahl.com for me, haha.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wiski
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mark Kennedy
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mark Kennedy
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Conis

    As the leads lose, so do the minds of the posters on this site.

    Hopefully we are back to leaf talk tomorrow instead of this inflamed vag!na talk

    Adios muchachossss
    GLG!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    appreciated what you had to say in many of your posts tonight. however, just because we lost four games to boston doesn’t mean that they were all equally bad. if not for gus’s obvious lack of confidence wednesday in facing the bruins-and perhaps with good reason all things considered-i think that game doesn’t become the semi-blowout it eventually became. he should never have let in their first goal. and you knew he was going to let in that chara shot long before chara took it. if not for the soft goals we just keep pressing and are allowed to build on the confidence being created by our success. also, if bozak doesn’t completely screw up the beauty feed from gardiner and pots that one into the empty net, it was game on. your other postings made you appear very rational and sensible, and then you go and throw the baby out with the bath water.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • darthNihilus

    A couple of wins and everyone here will go back to being giddy about what a great team we have. Then again, if we lose tonight to the rangers everyone will be calling for a trade etc, etc.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • IBleaf

    very strange move to start Reimer against the rangers, i guess Wilson just wants to get him the home game against NJ and get him and the crowd some confidence

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    Has Wilson announced Reimer is starting against the Rags? Last I heard it was Gus but with Wilson its a total guessing game anyway.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Let’s hope Gus isn’t getting the start because Reimer had a relapse..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mark Kennedy
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • darthNihilus
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/phillinbig phillinbig

    I’m glad somebody else noticed the blatant bias of the HNIC commentators. Honestly, other than Cherry and Bob Cole, I think the CBC hates the Leafs. I was incredibly irritated when Grabo scored, sniping it top corner, and Glen Healy just had to say, “well, you can tell that’s just one of those goals where you can tell he wasn’t even aiming!”. Coming from a guy who made a living as a back-up goalie, that’s just…fresh…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    you know, i wasn’t at all replying to the incredibly long chain of dialogue b/t you and cameron-or anyone else on this site. i was simply replying to your post regarding the lack of difference in how we played vs. boston in the four games played this season. that’s it. it was my opinion that we were playing a much better game against them on wednesday, and without a weak goal or two from gus at the worst moments, we wouldn’t have become so predictably disheartened and fell apart. and i wasn’t defending bozak, just remarking that if he could have scored there at the end of the period to keep it tied after two, the team could have had something they really needed to build upon against a team that is obviously in their heads right now. i wasn’t failing to see our failures. i wasn’t irrationally championing our play like some delusional homer. so i don’t need the lecture. save the passive-aggressive diatribe please. whether or not you feel attacked, perhaps you should take the time to read what is posted in reply to you to determine whether that is really the case. my point was that you were overstating a case regarding the similarity in play to make a point about our ineptitude against boston throughout the four games played. i was being objective in noting that although we lost all four games, and SOME elements were sadly predictive and similar, that does not mean they are all equatable to one another.
    ps-you won’t ever convince cameron of a different opinion. you will never change the way in which he interacts with others on this site. i agree that he is unconscionably abrasive at times, but deal with it. trust me, getting on your soap box and firing back in self-righteous indignation offends everyone else here as much as he does.
    pps-i started my reply with: “appreciate what you had to say in many of your posts tonight”, and got lectured. in the end, you come off as a much bigger asshole as you are the one advocating for rational exchanges. i think i would actually rather have cameron posting here. i don’t need you for a voice of rationality at MLHS. there are plenty of others who manage that without the attitude you bring with you.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)