Question and Answer Coming – We Need Your Questions First Though

by on January 11, 2012 in Site News - 396 Comments

Share

One of the best things about writing here at MLHS is far and away you, the readers.

Every week you guys are in full force reading, commenting, thinking about whatever is presented in front of you and throwing in your two cents. It makes for great discussions and it’s really appreciated.

Since I’ve been here doing Leafs Notebook, there have consistently been questions in the comments sections in regards to certain things I’ve wrote or something that the Leafs have done. Then as I was reading a Leafs “Q & A” elsewhere, I thought it would be a neat thing to do here. There have often been times when I get asked the same question by multiple people, or when somebody asks a question and my answer is posted the next day and therefore missed. Beyond that, it’s a lot more organized and easy to articulate in a post rather than the comments section.

So with that all said, we’re going to try a question and answer as a follow up to Leafs Notebook. You can post a question in the comments section here, but I’d prefer if you tweeted at me (https://twitter.com/#!/APetrielli). If anything, that improves the odds of your question getting answered because it will go directly to me. I’m going to be checking the comments, but there’s hundreds of comments every time so it’s really a toss up.

15 questions is my goal, but that number has yet to be fully determined. Whatever questions are picked, I’ll write my answers, and I’m sure you will all put your own answers in the comment section, which I look forward to.

In terms of the questions, please keep it related to the team that’s here – meaning the current roster – and questions that I can answer. If you’re asking me whether or not the Leafs are going to trade Luke Schenn, well, I have no clue. I’m not an insider and I’m not going to try and be one. Now if you ask me whether or not the Leafs can afford to trade Luke Schenn, that, I can answer.

So enough of me typing and you reading. Start sending in questions (once again: https://twitter.com/#!/APetrielli) and we’ll see how it goes. If this is successful, we’ll continue to do it each week or two. If not, well, we tried.

I look forward to hearing your questions!

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Jason B.

    ….Claude Giroux

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Schenn, Franson for JVR, 3rd. Go for Suter in offseason?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    you would think Toronto could get two forwards for Schenn.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Holy overpayment

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Way too much, Schenn for jvr and a third coming our way.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    too much IMO. i’d consider JVR / Schenn straight up.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    is JVR really worth that?!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    honest would love to get Hartnell he’s the type of fwd the leafs are missing… but that would NEVER happen :(

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    I’d consider Franson for jvr straight up.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    Haha, ya thats too much now that you guys mention it. I would do Schenn for JVR straight

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    From Philly I would want what they got from the Kings. Simmonds and Schenn. Not saying its gonna happen but thats one or the other isn’t entirely out of the question.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Not as impressed with JVR as many here apparently are

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    me neither…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    We need a forward with a natural meanstreak….hartnell, kassian, downie come to mind.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    He’s alright but hasn’t played like someone i would give Schenn + for.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous

    He’s alright but hasn’t played like someone i would give Schenn + for.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Renberg19

    Can I edit my question to “Do you think the Lupul/Kessel duo is better than the Hoglund/Renberg duo?”

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)