Leo Koma-(ing to America)-rov?

by on April 29, 2012 in Leafs News - 797 Comments

Share

According Puck Daddy’s Dmitry Chesnokov, it appears that the Maple Leafs are poised to sign 25 year old forward Leo Komarov, their 6th round pick from 2006, to an entry level contract following the World Championships. Last summer, it was believed that the team made a push to sign the young agitator but Komarov respectfully declined, preferring to spend one more season in the KHL. Should these rumors come to fruition, the Leafs will be adding plenty of nastiness and physicality to their bottom six group this fall.

The 5’11 210 pound Estonian born Finn has been honing his craft for the past 3 seasons against men in the KHL. At the NHL level, he likely fits in as a 4th line super pest who offers a high energy, in your face type of game. Komarov is an emotional player upon whom teammates can feed off of. His strengths lie primarily in a speedy, forechecking type of role with the ability to get under his opponents’ skin. He’s an average player in the 5 on 5 setup but is quite effective as an open ice forecheck due to his excellent skating and impressive ability  to recognize and close down open lanes. He absolutely loves to chirp and play really close to the edge, making him an easy target at times for officials. During his time in the Finnish SM-Liiga, he was named the league’s “Most Hated Player” three times.

Through 46 games played for Moscow Dynamo this season, he recorded 11 goals and 13 assists for 24 points in. He doesn’t offer much in the way of offense, but if he is able to harness that energy in a positive manner, he should be able to contribute plenty of value to the big club as early as next season. It would not be unreasonable for Komarov to find a niche similar to Jarkko Ruutu.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • djamon

    I’m sorry, but if you don’t want to bother to look up stats to see what’s actually true then don’t offer an opinion. Good/great, great/exceptional? What the fuck does that actually mean?

    And, for the record, if it wasn’t for Luongo the Canucks would have been swept in the Finals last year.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • bobwasyourdamnuncle
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    One with Vernon, 2 with Osgood, one with Hasek.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    so the Buttmans win again

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jay_Berg

    Playoffs or not I feel that if I ever get to a point where im watching a taped AHL game where i already know the outcome I’ll need to assess my life….

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafs89

    wow…. phoenix!? really!???

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mlhs.com/ gunner_36
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    I basically agree with you, and Burke, on this concept. Having said that, if other teams ARE willing to offer those deals aren’t we at a competitive disadvantage?

    And the Lecavalier deal is an outlier, IMO. He was offered way way more than he was actually worth on the open market, IMO, almost as a thanks for bringing the Cup to Florida.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jay_Berg

    Really interesting point man.

    It’d be fun to see how different the league would be if players contacts were not guaranteed like in the NFL.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    I remember those points being made too…how teams could win the Cup without a top-flite goalie. But the implication was actually that you could win without great goaltending…which has always been untrue.

    You want to assume that an average goalie will turn it on once the playoffs start? How did that work out for Chicago this year? Or Detroit?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    You may be right about the skaters’ deals, but I think Luongo will be fine into his late 30′s.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Hey, everyone thinks they have a reason to make up a rule. My only concern is if that rule potentially puts you at a disadvantage, in a competitive business, should you still keep it?

    And if we get 5 years out of Luongo, making him 37, I’d be ecstatic. All Leaf fans should be.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Bryz was shit, but luckily he was up against Fleury who was Toskalesque.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    why wont retirement negate his hit?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey-nerd.com Cameron
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    that is too funny,

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    If you think Luongo is, or will be soon, not worth the 5.33M Cap hit then that’s a valid argument. (One I disagree with, but meh). But you have to accept that all these deals were signed with the tacit understanding that those players would never see the last few years. Luongo, for instance, can be demoted at any point. Redden also has a NTC, but look what it got him.

    I would be amazed…shocked…if teams were punished in any way for already having one of these contracts on their roster when the new CBA is signed. Remember, they weren’t illegal when they were signed.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    It was signed before he was 35, but kicked in after he was 35, I believe.

    The Mogilny rule….lol.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)