Morning Mashup: Draft Possibilities

by on June 13, 2012 in Morning Mashup - 1,309 Comments

Share

Photo: Getty Images

Just nine days away from the NHL Entry Draft in Pittsburgh (and, can you believe it, eighteen away from UFA day), SB Nation has been conducting a mock draft with the consultation of its team bloggers. Last week, I promoted the Leafs‘ need to go for some “high ceiling” offensive talent with their fifth overall pick, if possible. How does this relate? Well, it was Pension Plan Puppets’ turn to pick in the SB Nation mock draft and  they were dealt a scenario wherein all of the forwards in the top five discussion were already selected and off the board.

It’s a muddy scenario for the Leafs, if it plays out that way. Those high on blueliner Ryan Murray (who PPP selected) may not see it the same, but the Leafs seem most interested in adding a high end offensive talent like Grigorenko or Galchenyuk according to most reports. It leads me to the question: if the Leafs find themselves in a position where all of Alex Galchenyuk, Mikhail Grigorenko and Filip Forsberg are gone by five, what should Burke do? After those four it seems to drop off in terms of offensive talent, or at least it becomes anyone’s guess as to who the next best forward is.

Should Burke and co.:

A) have traded up already.
B) draft the BPA (best player available) defenceman, in this case probably Ryan Murray.
C) Trade down, take two forwards like Radek Faksa and Tom Wilson (might not be doable, but for the sake of an example).

What say you?

***

LEAFS LINKS:

NHLNUMBERS CONSENSUS DRAFT LIST: WHO IS AVAILABLE AT NUMBER FIVE?
The Leafs Nation with a list of prospects ranked between 1-10 and 30-40, where the Leafs will be picking in rounds 1 and 2 as it stands.

Dear Brian, please focus on the task at hand.
Burke lashed out against the CBC again re: Elliotte Friedman’s “Luke Schenn to Edmonton for the first overall” rumour. Langlois asks him to concentrate on what he can control.

Should the Edmonton Oilers move #1
The Leafs are mentioned, of course. I won’t doubt Burke will inquire, but the yearly tradition of linking Burke to the first overall because he traded for the Sedin picks once is getting old and seems nothing more than a traffic grab. I love Friedman’s stuff, but basing the rumour in Burke’s penchant for attention on the “big stage” is just silly. That’s why he never does anything on deadline day, right?

Leafs prospect Colborne says he had wrist injury for most of the season
In case you missed it, Joe Colborne will undergo wrist surgery and spend the off season recovering. He battled the injury “most of the season,” so I wouldn’t be surprised if the ailment coincided with his drop off in point production from scathing hot at the start of the year to ice cold for the rest of it.

Leafs well positioned for draft
Interesting quote from Burke: “We have some positional needs,” Burke said. “Because the players are close in quality and close in terms of how we rank them, this might be one time we make a positional pick. I’ve never done that before, but I might.”

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Mattmark

    He’s the smallest of the group (176 lbs.).

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    I’d take Murray, worst case scenario we get a stud defenseman, and get another asset by trading one of our other D-man or Murray himself

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    But only 17, and will grow into his frame.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    I disagree, I think Grigo is exactly the kind of big & skilled centre that would put Lupul and Kessel over the top!!

    Of course, if him and Galchenyuk are both on the board, I’d go with Gally, no questions asked.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    I would not take Faksa if our only option is Murray b/c in a couple of years Murray will be a superstar D-man and we will have a 2nd line Centre (at best). Then we will be like why the hell didn’t we take Murray

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Quinten_24
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    Exactly my thinking, Gardner-Shultz,Phaneuf-Murray would be a sick Top 4

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark

    Because we need centres more than we need defensemen, and because someone who rates Murray as highly as you do might just give us enough of a package for the right to draft him to tip the final asset balance heavily in our favour.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    Depends on the asset i suppose, any example in mind?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Quinten_24
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Quinten_24
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HHT

    A strong back end would be great and a long time coming – not since Rouse, Macoun, Gill, Ellet, Lefebvre.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    With that top four we could trade Schenn and Franson and get some nice returns.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafbites
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HHT

    There are a few very good D to pick from.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    If Grigorenko is our only forward option (out of the four in the top 5) when it comes to our turn then i wud still take him. Work ethic aside we cant pass up on that kind of talent

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    If your compared to Scott Nedimeyer than your good enough to be on my team

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafbites
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    I’d take Murray and see what Edmonton would give up for him or another defenceman currently on the roster.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Gunnar/Liles-Schenn as the bottom pairing?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Or trade Schenn/Franson and Gunnarson/Liles for an upgrade on forward and go with a third pairing of Liles/Gunnarson-Schenn/Franson, depending on which two are traded and have Holzer up as the 7th defenceman.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)