Morning Mashup: Jonas and Some Quotes

by on June 26, 2012 in Morning Mashup - 514 Comments

Share

Photo: Mark Blinch/Reuters

Easily the most overlooked part of the draft bonanza and the Schenn-JvR deal, Jonas Gustavsson was dealt to the Winnipeg Jets for a conditional seventh round pick in next year’s entry draft.

You know, sometimes fans have a hard time finding sympathy for professional athletes because we’re so used to the mindset that they have everything most of us want to have or that they enjoy a far better lifestyle than any of us dare to dream about. It’s mostly because of said fact that them delivering/not delivering on the ice becomes the only important measuring stick when it comes to determining one’s glory or failure in the eyes of fans and team critics.

I would argue that since sports are about winning and winning is done by winners – players, coaches, trainers and GMs who help a team win and who, by default, win themselves – it’s the right measuring stick. My question is – is it the only measuring stick?

Brian Burke doesn’t think so, as he thanked the Monster for his services here, stating how he “saved our bacon” when our bacon needed saving. I’m not going to write this and demand you like Gustavsson, or pretend he was a good NHL goaltender while wearing a Leafs jersey, but I would like Leaf fans to treat him with a bigger degree of respect. During his time here, he most certainly endured.

Three heart ablation surgeries, personal tragedy – Jonas overcame all of that and played some good hockey for the Leafs. So he wasn’t Cujo, heck, he wasn’t even the Monster. Yet, despite all this, you can’t argue he didn’t have one hell of a heart. Be it losing his mind when scored upon, or fighting back right after those surgeries, you can’t argue he didn’t try. I’d like to think we as Leaf fans can at least reward that, we of all people know what it’s like to try and try again, and what it’s like to have Vesa Toskala stink up your crease and act like it’s no big deal (his on ice performance COUPLED by his off ice demeanor probably earned him a different set of standards to be judged by).

Modern day reporting often loses its touch with kindness, dignity and etiquette, so this writer took his chance to use this space to go a step beyond the result and focus on the person behind No.50. This is why obligated to saying something that many, not including our GM, forgot to do, and that was to thank Jonas for his time here… if for no other reason than because he deserved it, maybe not exclusively based on his on ice performance, but certainly based on the strength of his character and perseverance.

Good luck Gus, hope you make a bigger name for yourself in Winnipeg.

JvR and Yankees

Upon hearing that he was traded to Toronto, JvR said that the Leafs are basically the NY Yankees of the NHL. Cue the “not winning” jokes. However, since everyone knows he was talking about tradition and making a market/team interest comparison, I didn’t really understand what the fuss was about. More importantly, it’s great to see a young player appreciating/paying tribute to the organization and relishing the prospect of playing in a high-expectation market.

Better yet, you’ll be happy to hear his Yankees comparison doesn’t mean JVR is a Yankees fan. He was apparently wearing a Blue Jays hat when he found out the news on Saturday, and wore it on Off The Record and Sportsnet Connected yesterday.

Aaron Portzline and Roberto Luongo

Yesterday, the Columbus Dispatch reporter Aaron Portzline tweeted:

“Told by very good source Canucks G Roberto Luongo has – to this point — declined to waive no-trade clause to go to Blackhawks or Leafs. Luongo using the power of his no-trade to “steer” a trade to Panthers as much as possible at this point in off-season.”

Source or no source, this makes little sense to me. There is only a limited number of teams that are in need of a No.1 goaltender/could take on his contract in terms of cap hit and real money. Three of those teams are supposedly on Luongo’s go to list. One of them is the Panthers. Actually, you’d think the Panthers are one such team, but they aren’t an upper echelon spending team in terms of salary (just $40,644,500 at this point according to capgeek.com).

Also, the Panthers are expected to give playing time to their future No.1 goaltender Jacob Markstrom. In my mind, coming back to Vancouver’s crease would be a really awkward situation for Luongo and the team. The organization hadn’t shown faith in him before, he reportedly asked for a trade, and he has a mammoth deal which makes Cory Schneider look even better to Mike Gills.  If it’s all but certain he won’t return to that environment, why would Luongo limit himself to just one destination, which, besides his family and him being familiar with it, has just one thing to offer – less spotlight, less pressure? Ok, you got me – sunshine.

When it comes down to it, Mike Gillis can tell the media keeping Luongo is a possibility all he wants, his leverage is limited and his hands are tied. I think I can objectively say the Leafs remain one of very few viable suitors at this time. I’m not going to pretend I know for sure he’s coming to the Leafs or not coming to the Leafs, but I will say this: If the Luongo “sweepstakes” are going to drag out for some time while Gillis accepts the implications of handing Luongo a 12-year contract, you’ve got to be weary of what you read. Mind games have been played and will continue to play out.

YOUR LINKS:

Today at 3 p.m. we find out if Mats Sundin goes to the Hall in his first year up. I wouldn’t normally link to this site but the quotes from Fletcher trump any site rivalry. Interesting stuff here:

“To this day, there’s erroneous information that he provided me a list of possible teams or that I flat-out asked him to waive his contract privilege. I don’t operate that way; I have too much respect for the game and for the provisions of a contract. And, I had waytoo much respect for Mats to make such a bold request. It never got to the point of other teams. I simply went up to Mats and said, ‘If you want a crack at winning the Stanley Cup this season, I think I can trade you to a club in that position.’ He thanked me and said he would mull it over for a few days.

“Eventually, he came back and said he felt uncomfortable bailing out on his teammates at the end of a difficult season – that he should stay with the group, as captain, until the end. And, that was it. There was no further prodding on my part whatsoever. He chose to exercise a contract privilege negotiated in good faith and I completely respected his decision.”

Cam Charron examines Gills’ “Moneypuck” approach to roster planning.

PPP examines 2012 Leafs draft picks: Dominic Toninato, Connor Brown, Ryan Rupert, Viktor Lööv, Matt Finn

Scratch beneath the surface and the Gustavsson and Schenn deals reveal something about the Leafs… by VLM

Plenty of interest in pending UFA Justin Schultz – by Ken Campbell.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • dlb
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    Ok so why would any sane GM want to be moving the sure thing for a maybe and how does that maybe demand anything?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lescott

    I prefer Dougie to Mats but Mats was here longer scored a lot more goals and was captain for ages. Also he was so fucking clutch. From an objective stand point you should bet on Mats ahead of Dougie.

    And Giguere, I don’t think Parise’s coming our way because he’s going to have some serious perrenial contenders after him. As for Backstrom, he’s fine, but I want an older goalie to give our young guys a few years to gather some experience and then he can piss off when they mature.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Ugh…say no to 5 good years of goaltending?

    You’re gonna have to come up with a pretty darn good reason why we turn our backs on that. And do it without mentioning the contract…it doesn’t apply here.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    lol

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafs93

    Gilmour is a Greater Leaf than Sundin for so many other intricate reasons. Love Sundin but I love Gilmour more. Has nothing to do with length of stay.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    maybe he’s unbeatable in practice
    i remember they said Hasek was just that, so they gave him a shot.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • NHL88
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    and he gets to play with Suter

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Why are you asking me? Ask Gillis, I think they’re fucking crazy for wanting to move Luongo.

    I’m sure the contract is the single biggest reason. But I’m also sure they don’t view Schneider as a “maybe” anymore.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • KingTon
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    How can’t they. You even said he’s been a backup for the last 6 years. To me it makes way more sense to move him.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Zeus
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • SalmingsScar
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    “So many”?

    Name a few then, and make sure they’re things Sundin didn’t also bring to the table.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Rats I was hoping they would invite Howser

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Playing for LA :)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Nothing, IMO. I was only predicting the other poster would say it was.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sk8trBoi

    First, it’s still a big “if” that we would get 5 years of elite level goaltending.

    Second, that’s a big waste of 25+ million of cap space after that 5 years.

    Third, what talent would we have to give up to get him?

    Fourth, the opportunity lost on putting that money to better use on other players.

    Fifth, what if Reimer turns out to be the goalie he was a year ago?

    Sixth, perhaps a better option might be available via trade.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    goaltending has more of an impact than a winger IMO so Loungo and Mac

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)