Morning Mashup: Silent Still

by on November 15, 2012 in Morning Mashup - 894 Comments

Morning Mashup: Silent Still
Share

That horsecrap title’s a reference to the first computer game I ever owned, Silent Steel. It was terrible, and I was enthralled by it. Dubbed an “interactive movie”, it was literally a Choose Your Own Adventure that used filmed segments instead of a cheap little paperback book to tell its story and have you make decisions which guided the plot. The Wikipedia entry literally describes it as “an unorthodox submarine simulator computer game.” What’s an orthodox submarine simulator computer game?

Anyways, it’s a meaningless pun because this meaningless lockout is still ongoing, and nothing is happening, and your Thursday Morning Mashup seems to have become a weekly forum for me to find some new complaint about it. So little seems to have come of last week’s marathon bargaining sessions (aside from a sickening “so close, and yet so far” sensation) that I’m not sure there’s anything really worth noting. So I’ll share some slightly-related anecdotes.

On Monday, I was in downtown Toronto for a meeting and had some afternoon time to kill. I wandered over to the HHOF to watch them prep for the induction ceremony – sadly, without any media credentials myself, so the high point of the day was sharing a crosswalk with James Duthie on his way into Brookfield Place. Access was still wide open prior to the event, so I wandered in. Hung out on the unguarded red carpet, walked around the setup, took a photo for sentimentality’s sake.

At the risk of sounding all philosophical-like, I just sort of stood there for about five minutes and had a good think. I’m sure the event staff wondered if they had a problem/crazy on their hands.

It just felt so strange. Here was the staging of what would be a truly memorable and meaningful night for individuals who’d dedicated their lives to the game and represented it with the utmost integrity. The ceremony was deserved. But even before it began, it felt so tainted.

I know I’m late to the party on this, and plenty’s been discussed on the “should Bettman/Daly have even attended” front. I’m not really going to get into that. In lieu of having something real to talk about this morning, I just thought I’d share the depressingly empty feeling one writer felt seeing what should be an event symbolic of sport-wide pride and yet being totally incapable of shaking the sickening cloud of despair and greed that’s permeated the entire thing. It’s just…surreal.

You want to think something as simple as, “It’s so cool to be standing here.” But the entire thing just feels so…illegitimate. This lockout has become a smear on the very sport, and it’s a cancer that’s undeniably spreading into the very sentimentality that keeps us coming back.

Let me be clear – I don’t mean the induction itself. Those players deserved every modicum of recognition they received that night. I don’t mean the ceremony is illegitimate. I mean, the standing on it is.

We’re supposed to believe that the NHL, the owners – however you want to phrase it – give any sort of damn about sentiment. In reality, they preach the value of integrity and history with one hand while they willingly suspend the game itself on the basis of pure monetary greed with the other. It’s the ultimate hypocrisy.

That’s it. If this lockout ends up having a theme, it will be hypocrisy.

A conversation with a friend earlier this week led to some discussion about just how much the owners knew or suspected about this lockout before it happened. Now, I’m not here to present conspiracy theories. But there’s something fundamentally wrong with the entire idea.

Basically, they’re not allowed to collude against the interest of players when the game is on. They can’t work together to artificially lower player values in free agent season, they can’t conspire against the players collectively, and – like any other business – a signed contract is a signed contract.

But the CBA expires, and suddenly: collusion isn’t only legal, it’s deemed necessary? Solidarity goes from being forbidden, to being a game plan.

The entire lockout is the definition of collusion, isn’t it? I mean, the basic premise is, “We did a bunch of things willingly in competition with each other that we now see as fiscal mistakes and would like to collectively take a bunch of money back.” Am I oversimplifying it?

I’m getting dangerously close to a wandering rant here, so I’ll stop. We all know why this isn’t fixed yet. We just don’t want to believe it.

That would mean accepting the reality of just how stubborn, ego-driven, and greedy human beings can really be. But hey, many of us work for or run businesses that are built on the same principles. So I guess us calling the NHL owners out is technically hypocrisy, too.

The difference is, we have no problem realizing and admitting that.

-Matt Mistele
http://www.twitter.com/TOTruculent

Thursday morning links:

-DGB has a new Grantland piece about a secret first draft of Bettman’s HHOF induction ceremony speech. It’s hilarious, and written in spirit that’s similar to a few of the posts I’ve done here. Like this. Or this. That’s…neat? I’ll keep occasionally writing MLHS ones if you all promise, one day, to buy my ‘Best of’ book so I can repeatedly Retweet your overwhelming praise.

-Top 13 Mats Sundin moments, via PPP. Would be awesomer if the post didn’t use a snap from that horrific, soul-crushing loss to Montreal on Mats Sundin night as a feature image.

-Brian Burk talked analytics on Tuesday. Have we seen this yet? Of course we probably have.

-Via TLN, some are having problems with the physics of NHL ’13. They are, apparently, too entertaining.

-Just when we thought it wasn’t humanly possible, TSN’s daily “yep, there’s still a lockout” post contains quotes from both sides expressing their total willingness to meet amongst other quotes saying they have no plans to. WHAT THE [CENSORED]!?!?!

-Here’s a Kevin McGran/Star piece (with more Burke quotes) about how you draft the right athletes. Sweet Jesus. A June topic given a November headline. Someone, please, end this lockout now.

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • dlb

    djamon
    i wonder what the league would look like if all the GMs had Burke’s integrity.  i mean, some hate how he doesn’t go all out to work within the rules, but the league suffers when a handful of GMs operate that way.
    if every team had a guy like Burke as their GM would the league be crying poor?
    (some people might not be able to get past the Burke love in this comment to know what i mean to say, that’s alright)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    But you do realize the Players have no say in whether the league contracts or teams relocate?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    Dooooooorrrrraaaaaaaaaaaan, noooooooooooooooooooooo

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Edward Flannery

    Ohh completely agree 50-50 is a fair spilt, for now.  They got the last deal done in that way because thats negotiating, you live with what you can live with in order to get what you cant live with done, thats day 1 my friend.  The success of the league the past few years is only more of an indication on how necessary the cap was/is.  
    I can agree with you that the owners and players need to approach this as a partnership, what i cant agree with you on is what defines that partnership.  
    Is paying a persons salary, mortgage, travel, meal, living, etc. expenses while “sharing” half of HRR a true partnership? 
    If you get half the rewards and none of the yearly cost to get the rewards we arent partners, you would be an initial investor.  We cant pick what is “partnered” and what isn’t, either its 50-50 on everything or by definition i employ you.     

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    I agree with this 100%. But unfortunately, as someone else said, the NHL is not a single entity…it’s 30 separate ones.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Are you saying you stopped cheering for Doug Gilmour when he was traded?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MSM

    I agree. The free market model would allow only money making teams to survive, which most fans wouldn’t like. I’m not arguing that. I’m just pointing out that the real world comparisons people make to justify either side of the lockout are a colossal waste of time. The current NHL model has nothing to do with examples from the real business world.

    I also keep seeing comments about how the NHL loses money each year when in fact the league overall made a profit of more than $100-million last season. Of course that figure doesn’t show the wide discrepancy between the mega money makers and the rest of the league. But I wonder how a mediator or arbitrator would look at that figure.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Waiting4LSC

    A lot has been said about greed. In absolute terms I would consider both parties greedy. In relative terms though I’m not sure greed comes into play as much as each party is fighting for what they believe is their fair share. To us what they think is fair may be ludicrous, but to them it is relative and important.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman,s Bettsy

    Now your talking Professor!!!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jcg_4

    I don’t think so; by the way, well thought out and insightful comeback.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman,s Bettsy

    Yep!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    “Is paying a persons salary, mortgage, travel, meal, living, etc. expenses while “sharing” half of HRR a true partnership?”

    Isn’t all that the Players’ half?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Edward Flannery

    Thats a good point, i dont want to see the cap drop at all.  I think it makes sense the cap would rise, if the owners are making more couldn’t they spend more?  The X factor is those termed contracts, capping them at 5 im sure plays a big role in the cap. 
    Which is another reason i never got Crsobys comments on how if it isnt broken dont fix it, with all these long term backended deals the point is to appear normal while taking advantage of the system.  It may not be broken “now” but the contracts signed now will break it in the futur. 

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    dj
    yeah, i wasn’t making a point, just wondering …
    but now here’s my opinion…i think the league should tighten up it’s operation so the teams have to act more Burke-like.  find a balance where each team can do some things its way, but not everything.  not at the expense of the health of the league.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    You included mortgage in this particular rant, I’m going to assume it’s an oversight. Teams don’t buy players houses

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Edward Flannery

    the players half of revenue?
    I may be mistaken but my understanding is that the players do not pay for any of those things.  Their split of the HRR is pure dollars to them, does not come with a spend.  

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    dj…when Doug Gilmour went to Jersey, i don’t know that i ever watched him play … if he was my cousin i probably would have tried to check the Devil’s schedule to see when i could catch a game, but i could care less.
    #93 will always hold a place in my heart, for what he accomplished in a Maple Leafs uni
    (and in my memory in a cow suit dammit)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    Lol…sorry. I just don’t know how to respond to someone who thinks the Team is the product and not the Players. It’s like saying Ikea is the Product and not the furniture inside.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Edward Flannery

    fair, 
    they do in the salaries they give them.  I have also heard that some owners pay the rent/mortgage for their players as enticement to come play.  For say a European player they would foot the bill for a nice Condo in Toronto during year and player returns to their home in the summer. 

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    There’s a lot the Players can give back for sure, but I wonder once you’ve determined how much of the pie they’re going to get what it matters how that piece is divided.

    The Owners want to control how much the Players get and also how they split it up. Seems kinda controlling to me. Not really a Partnership.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    Teams cover travel and hotel accommodations but they don’t buy groceries for the players or pay the rent or buy them cars or houses

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    That makes sense…but would the Owners even want the NHL telling them how to run their business?

    To be honest I’m not even sure the Leafs should be required to operate under the same restrictions as shit franchises like Columbus and Phoenix.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Edward Flannery

    Ikea = Brand                                                     NHL= Brand 
    Furniture= product                                          Hockey= product 
    Easily assembled = selling point                     Best players in world= selling product

    Just think of the players as the worlds best allan key operators, if they all worked for IKEA and assembled their cheap shit in an hour for you it would be the mother of all businesses.  

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon

    The players get their share and use it to purchase all those things you listed.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jcg_4

    before Gretzky, there was Orr and after Gretzky there was Crosby…there will always be the next one; that’s just a fact…all players have a shelf life…the only constant is the franchise.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)