2013 World Junior Championship – Semi-Finals – Canada vs USA II

by on January 3, 2013 in 2013 World Junior Championships - 934 Comments

2013 World Junior Championship – Semi-Finals – Canada vs USA II
Photo: Nathan Denette/Canadian Press
Share

Just when you were getting used to a more sane sleeping schedule, the Russian organizers do this to us.

Canada and the United States will faceoff in a rematch of their opening round game which saw Canada skate off with a 2-1 win in which neither team played up to its potential.

Since then, Canada played a complete game against the Russians while the United States picked up a couple of wins against the tournament’s also-rans.  Confidence should be reasonably high for both teams and at the risk of sounding trite, the United States will have redemption on their minds.

A great deal of the completeness of Canada’s game can be attributed to the return of Boone Jenner to the line-up.  I had been playing the part of the parrot during my pre-game threads; consistently and repeatedly lamenting the lack of chemistry in the bottom-6 forward group and hoping that once Jenner returned things would sort themselves out.  Well, he did and they did.  Jenner and Danault were a forechecking, puck possession force in the third period of the Russia game and were a big reason why, even despite what score effects typically do to shot totals, Canada was able to significantly outshoot the Russians in their 4-1 win.

Spott’s line shake-up also proved to be a positive for the team as Jonathan Drouin looked fantastic skating with RNH and Mark Scheifele.  Add to this another strong game from Malcolm Subban and Canada looks to be rounding into form from top to bottom.

In their last matchup, Seth Jones had probably his worst game of the tournament and Rocco Grimaldi’s shot-happy Sergei Berezin / Jason Blake impression really stifled the American attack.  The most dangerous offensive player in the game was probably defenseman Jacob Trouba who snuck free in the offensive zone a couple of times and scored the lone American goal.

Once again, John Gibson is the type of goalie who is eminently capable of stealing a game and the American speed and the ability of their defensemen to pinch on the play has the potential to create problems for Team Canada.  Team USA is still waiting for their big line to have an impact against the tournament’s better teams and if they do this morning, then Canada will have to be near-perfect everywhere else if they hope to advance to the gold medal game.

From Canada’s perspective, they’ll need to limit penalties against the Americans — particularly those of the 5-minute variety.  The only Canadian player who seems to be prone to minor penalties is Ryan Strome but one hopes that Coach Spott has impressed upon him the importance of discipline going forward in this tournament.  Aside from that, more of the same from Subban and the top line and Canada will likely be punching their ticket to the gold medal game.

No easy games left.  Go Canada Go!

1st Intermission Update

Well, that’s what happen when one team has a great defensive period and the other is a chaotic, disorganized mess in their own zone.

The US, to their credit, played exceptional transition defense in that period and their speed on the counter-attack was backing down the Canadian defense and leading to chances left, right, and center.

The first American goal was scored by Jake McCabe after the Americans got about a half-dozen shots in a single sequence and Subban didn’t look comfortable on any of them.  The US got after every rebound and loose puck and it led to the first goal of the game.

The second American goal was also scored by McCabe, this time in transition.  As you’d expect from a defenseman, McCabe was the high-man in the zone and found a gap in the coverage between the two wingers.  Some good passing and an apparent screen on Subban and 2-0 is where we stand heading into the second period.

On a positive note, Biggs had a very solid period.  He was good on the forecheck and had a couple of chances in the offensive zone.

2nd Intermission Update

More of the same from Canada in the 2nd period.  Disorganized on defense, largely dis-interested on offense, and clearly frustrated by the calibre of defensive play they’ve been running into during this game.  The few times Canada has managed a quality scoring chance, Gibson has made it look like a routine save.

The third American goal came in transition after a bad change.  What looked like a 2-on-1 with Ryan Murphy as the ’1′ was turned into effectively a breakaway as Murphy initially looked to take away the pass and then drastically over committed to the puck carrier John Gaudreau who didn’t even need to make a move to clear Murphy out of the way and score.

Jimmy Vesey then put the Americans up 4-0, once again burning the Canadian defense in transition.  A nice quick move on the outside by Vesey to beat the defense and change the angle of the shot.  Tough to blame Subban given the completeness of the Canadian collapse but he didn’t have his best game either and got the hook in favour of Binnington.

Binnington has looked good in relief as the goalie change did nothing to spark the Canadian Team.  The United States has dominated this game in every way and it would take a comeback that would make yesterday’s Russia – Switzerland game look like a 90s New Jersey Devils game for this one to end in Canada’s favour.

I sincerely hope that one of the reporters has the guts to ask Spott the tough questions about Murphy’s inclusion after the game but I have my doubts.

5-1 Final

Canada had their best period of the game but were still the second best team on the ice.  Gibson was sensational and Canada wasn’t able to swing the momentum in their favour despite some decent play.

Canada scored the first goal of the period… kinda.  After Ty Rattie fired a shot off of the crossbar, the referee blew the whistle, and the ensuing rebound found Rattie’s stick with Gibson too far out of position from the initial shot to have any hope at making a second save.  Rattie put the puck in the net anyway and after review it counted for some reason.  Typical IIHF hackjob, basically.

The game’s final goal came after a great blueline to blueline pass from JT Miller to John Gaudreau sprung the diminutive forward on a partial breakaway.  Great shot by Gaudreau beat Binnington and the Americans cruised to a well deserved victory from there.

The good from that period included the reigns coming off Rielly a little bit.  He looked far more like himself, joining or leading the rush offensively and using a toe-drag-shot-between-the-defenseman’s-legs move that he goes to with some regularity in the WHL.  Binnington looked good in relief and probably deserves to start the bronze medal game.

Having played only one good game in the tournament with a lockout strengthened lineup, Spott will have to come up with some answers for why this team never really came together.  The defense in particular seemed to be a problem after the team cut Frankie Corrado who had a great camp in favour of Ryan Murphy who, aside from possibly Dumba, was the worst defenseman in camp.  MacKinnon never got enough icetime, nor did Rielly and the zone entries on the powerplay were some of the more disjointed I’ve ever seen on international ice.

Canada will play the loser of Sweden – Russia sometime Saturday morning.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

Comments are currently inactive while we debug the new Real-time Commenting System.
  • 934 comments
  • Collapse All

@Yaknowwhat Definitely.  I have mixed feelings on the bye. I just figured adding another game opens up the risk of losing out of medal contention altogether while leaving intact the possibility (acknowledged very slim) your team could still go 4-1 and be out.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
6:09 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
Considering Canada,USA and Russia were all in the same group..I would gladly take my chances in the other group....

@Shift_Disturber Considering Canada,USA and Russia were all in the same group..I would gladly take my chances in the other group….

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
6:00 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Shift_Disturber
Shift_Disturber4 mths ago
yeah. I shortened my reply up. Some view the bye as an advantage others a disadvantage. To each his own though.

What happens if the winner from group A loses to the loser from group B in this quarter final game?

new thread up

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:55 PM • 3 Jan 13

@Yaknowwhat yeah. I shortened my reply up. Some view the bye as an advantage others a disadvantage. To each his own though. What happens if the winner from group A loses to the loser from group B in this quarter final game?

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:55 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
Yeh I believe it is a solution....from what I understand the winner of group A would play the loser in Group B in a quarterfinal game..a crossover....a quarter final game is being seen as an advantage by many..and sitting or getting a bye as a negative..so yeh..this addresses a couple of things for me..

@Yaknowwhat no disagreement here…I want hockey to start cause it’s winter and I’m bored of watching TV with the wife lol, but both sides can go fuck themselves with all this crap

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:55 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
Both sides deserve each other....if there both going to dig in then I hope they both suffer....getting impatient with both sides never ending BS...

@Loric76 Both sides deserve each other….if there both going to dig in then I hope they both suffer….getting impatient with both sides never ending BS…

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:53 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Loric76
Loric764 mths ago
So no hockey till 2015 then?

@Loric76 Interesting that the players are pushing to have the CBA expire in June instead of September…always wondered why it was in September…

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:53 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Loric76
Loric764 mths ago
Elliotte Friedman ‏@FriedgeHNIC
Couple of CBA notes: Both sides seemingly agreed on 10-year deal, but NHL wants opt-out after 8. Players want it to be 7. Also...

Elliotte Friedman ‏@FriedgeHNICplayers want expiry date to be June 30, NHL wants it to stay Sept. 15.

New thread up.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:53 PM • 3 Jan 13

@Yaknowwhat So no hockey till 2015 then?

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:52 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
I actually hope they do it...

@TheCanucksnaphook He’s going to be a very good NHL goalie very soon I think.  With Viktor Fasth and Igor Bobkov in the system, I think Hiller will be looking for a new team soon.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:52 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to TheCanucksnaphook
TheCanucksnaphook4 mths ago
Gibson=stud in net

I just want them to play hockey. I have no interest in one side showing the other side who is boss in any way. Lose the egos and just play already.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:52 PM • 3 Jan 13

Elliotte Friedman ‏@FriedgeHNIC Couple of CBA notes: Both sides seemingly agreed on 10-year deal, but NHL wants opt-out after 8. Players want it to be 7. Also… Elliotte Friedman ‏@FriedgeHNICplayers want expiry date to be June 30, NHL wants it to stay Sept. 15.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:52 PM • 3 Jan 13

Pierre LeBrun ‏@Real_ESPNLeBrun Still 7-8 unresolved issues between both sides but big ones are Year 2 cap, length of player contracts, pensions…

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:51 PM • 3 Jan 13

@Loric76 I actually hope they do it…

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:51 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Loric76
Loric764 mths ago
Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger
Some players are concerned the league is digging in post-disclaimer deadline. New vote about to begin. PA will use disclaimer if necessary.

@leafslunch ummmmmmm yep!

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:51 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to leafslunch
leafslunch4 mths ago
 Toilet trip?

Pierre LeBrun ‏@Real_ESPNLeBrun On CBA length: NHLPA willing to go to 10 years with opt-out after Year 7; NHL at 10 years with opt-out after Year 8

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:50 PM • 3 Jan 13

Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger Some players are concerned the league is digging in post-disclaimer deadline. New vote about to begin. PA will use disclaimer if necessary.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:50 PM • 3 Jan 13

@Shift_Disturber Yeh I believe it is a solution….from what I understand the winner of group A would play the loser in Group B in a quarterfinal game..a crossover….a quarter final game is being seen as an advantage by many..and sitting or getting a bye as a negative..so yeh..this addresses a couple of things for me..

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:50 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Shift_Disturber
Shift_Disturber4 mths ago
That's the nature of the tournament, pretty well any tournament with a round robin sort out.

We finished first in the round robin portion the U.S finished 4th. Semi final 1st vs 4th, winner plays for gold, loser plays for bronze. We got sorted at the semi final point. I have absolutely no issue with it.

Sucks that we lost but the better team on the ice today won. So be it.

I believe they are only eliminating the bye. So Canada would have had to play a quarter final game as well. It's not a solution to the problem you dislike.

@Cameron Gibson=stud in net

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:49 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Cameron
Cameron4 mths ago
They also brought the right defenders for the big open ice and then let them play their game.  That, and of course goaltending.  I actually have no interest in shitting on Subban over it, but Gibson was fantastic.

@TheCanucksnaphook They also brought the right defenders for the big open ice and then let them play their game.  That, and of course goaltending.  I actually have no interest in shitting on Subban over it, but Gibson was fantastic.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:48 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to TheCanucksnaphook
TheCanucksnaphook4 mths ago
Definitely a Canadian.....we got beat by a solid american team who was hungry and played the underdog role to perfection.

@Yaknowwhat Definitely a Canadian…..we got beat by a solid american team who was hungry and played the underdog role to perfection.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:46 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
I didn't know you were American.. 

That’s the nature of the tournament, pretty well any tournament with a round robin sort out. We finished first in the round robin portion the U.S finished 4th. Semi final 1st vs 4th, winner plays for gold, loser plays for bronze. We got sorted at the semi final point. I have absolutely no issue with it. Sucks that we lost but the better team on the ice today won. So be it. I believe they are only eliminating the bye. So Canada would have had to play a quarter final game as well. It’s not a solution to the problem you dislike.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:46 PM • 3 Jan 13

@TheCanucksnaphook I didn’t know you were American.. 

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:46 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to TheCanucksnaphook
TheCanucksnaphook4 mths ago
Fuck I hate the NHL and NHLPA.

@Loric76 Fuck I hate the NHL and NHLPA.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:44 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Loric76
Loric764 mths ago
Katie Strang ‏@KatieStrangESPN
#CBA According to NY Southern District Court spokesperson, a status conference has been scheduled between NHL/NHLPA this Monday at 9:30 a.m.

David Pagnotta ‏@TheFourthPeriod The NHLPA’s internal conference call is still ongoing.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:44 PM • 3 Jan 13

Katie Strang ‏@KatieStrangESPN #CBA According to NY Southern District Court spokesperson, a status conference has been scheduled between NHL/NHLPA this Monday at 9:30 a.m.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:44 PM • 3 Jan 13

@TheCanucksnaphook And thats exactly why the format is being changed in 2014..

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:39 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to TheCanucksnaphook
TheCanucksnaphook4 mths ago
No I dont.  Sorry its the format of the tournament.

@Yaknowwhat You gotta know when you can shit the bed and when you can’t ;)

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:38 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
But the American team shit the bed twice..and we only shit the bed once...you see why it makes no sense?

@rustynail Amen sir.   Question for you. Background first. I grew up a soccer fan and player. I am use to the concept of a draw. In competitions, overtime is played for a fixed period of time, no sudden death, and is extended until there is a winner. I would be comfortable with a regular season draw in the NHL, but at least preserve sudden death overtime. So to the question. Why does Hockey not recognize a draw, why does there have to be a winner.  (As an aside, the hybrid 1 point to each team, with the eventual winner getting a second ticks me off.) 

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:38 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to rustynail
rustynail4 mths ago
The shoot out sucks period.

@Yaknowwhat No I dont.  Sorry its the format of the tournament.

  • 0
    Replies
  • Reply
5:38 PM • 3 Jan 13 • in reply to Yaknowwhat
Yaknowwhat4 mths ago
But the American team shit the bed twice..and we only shit the bed once...you see why it makes no sense?
Load more comments