Game in 10: Game #3, Leafs 5 at Pens 2

by on January 23, 2013 in Game Day, Post Game, Toronto Truculent - 635 Comments

Game in 10: Game #3, Leafs 5 at Pens 2
James van Riemsdyk
Photo: Getty Images
Share

It might actually be a Game in 9. Or a Game in 27. Who knows? I’m writing this sentence at 7:08pm.

1. The game just started, and I’m already sick of the TSN commentary dedicated to “PHIL HASN’T SCORED YET AND IT’S GAME #3!” He’s been making plays amazingly well since Saturday and even backchecking. Like, a lot of backchecking, for him. I really hope this first point turns redundant at some point in the next couple hours.

2. I like Tyler Bozak. I really do. But a first line/Kessel-capable centre, he remains not. He’s tenacious and full of energy, but he simply doesn’t read plays as quickly as Kessel, and it costs the Leafs chances they should otherwise have a a result of Kessel’s (did I mention wickedly underrated?) playmaking ability. Update: He would score a PP goal in the dying minutes, wouldn’t he? Fine. You can stay, Tyler.

3. Engelland and Orr go at it early with a terrific scrap that express everything hypocritical about fighting in the NHL. Starts with a confrontation at the blue line (where it looks like Engelland tried to pull Orr’s helmet off?), transitioned into a standup fight with lots of impressively heavy blows landed (props to those guys, seriously), went on needlessly long to the point where they were both exhausted and praying for the refs to step in, then ended with smiles, hugs, and handshakes for all. Probably a “good job,” “you too,” in there as well.  What a sport.

4. “Sluggish” was indeed a good way to describe JVR when the game started. There was no jump to his game. Everything he did was tentative…or missed the net. Up until what became point #8 in this summary, he was kinda sorta Lee Stempniak.

5. A) Does Mike Komiarek really think that (first period) cross check isn’t a penalty?  B) Why on earth did Komisarek start tonight over Franson? C) Franson has to be wondering what the hell he’s done so wrong in Toronto. I bet they score here….UPDATE: Yep.

6. Malkin’s first goal on Reimer was pretty soft. Great quick shot, but from a sharp angle. It’s one goal. The sky is not falling. But it’s the kind of goal Reimer’s got to stop allowing if he’s going to make the jump everyone wants him to make and really silence his critics.

7. The Leafs’ first goal came off a curious MacArthur-Kulemin-Kadri combination (amidst a shift change) that looked dirty in execution but was actually a pretty slick rush. Kadri was likely trying to shoot, but he shouldn’t confirm that, because it was a pretty terrific pass.

8. Wow. The second goal is way more impressive. Borrowing a word from Ferraro, a glorious break wide on the rush by Kulemin sets up JVR for a tap-in, rendering point #4 in this moot. A JVR-Grabo-Kulemin line has made a whole lot of sense on paper since the winger was acquired from Philadelphia.

9. The Toronto Maple Leafs’ 5 on 3 power play is a consistently sad, immobile, indecisive, non-intimidating display of erectile dysfunction.

10. Oh boy. JVR really let that shot go for his second goal. Excellent timing for a wakeup, since our LW1 may have just left the ice with a broken hand.

11. Grabovski, Wednesday: “I need more fire. Fire burn the ice.” I think I know what he means, but regardless, what a shot for the Leafs’ fourth goal. Is it too early to establish that any players featured in Carlyle’s game day comments will automatically be awesome that night? (Ergo: MAYBE YOU SHOULD START REVEALING YOUR STARTING GOALIE, RANDY!)

12. Here’s the James Reimer problem. Everyone will focus on the softness of the two goals he allowed tomorrow. And sort of maybe kind of rightfully so. Even the Crosby breakaway (“COME ON, IT’S A CROSBY BREAKAWAY!”) was a pretty weak shot. But the real story should be how solid – if not very exceptional – Reimer was on everything else. Not bad for his first start in how many hundreds of days, against one of the league’s best teams.

13. Mike Kostka still doesn’t look out of place in the NHL. He brings the sort of sound, well-rounded play that we usually look to Gunnarson for.

14. Solid all-around effort by the Leafs. A very defensively capable showing against one of the NHL’s best offensive teams, which is something we should all be considerably encouraged about. No one predicted a 5-2 Leaf victory today.

The Toronto Maple Leafs under Randy Carlyle are, night and day, a different team than the Toronto Maple Leafs under Ron Wilson. Tenacious on the puck, defensively sound, and just visibly organized. It’s still early in the season. It would be foolish to draw sweeping conclusions from the first week.

Considering how crappy I felt as a Leafs fan less than two weeks ago, however…a night like Wednesday’s Pittsburgh opener is a positive worth remembering.

Toronto Maple Leafs vs Pittsburgh Penguins Boxscore

No.
Player
Pos
G
A
P
+/-
PIM
S
Hits
BkS
GvA
TkA
FO%
TOI
3D. PhaneufD0000031200-25:47:00
8M. KomisarekD0003201100-14:27
11J. McClementC000000100033%12:48
16C. MacArthurL1121051000-16:08
18M. BrownR0000002000-6:27
19J. LupulL00000000000%9:40
21J. van RiemsdykL2132232000-16:11
24J. LilesD0000000300-20:26
28C. OrrR0000500010-6:15
36C. GunnarssonD0003200200-19:16
41N. KuleminL033301210050%18:32
42T. BozakC101001120155%23:16
43N. KadriC011102000013%12:12
47L. KomarovC000000410150%12:04
51J. GardinerD0000010001-17:29
53M. KostkaD0110410110-23:16
81P. KesselR0000050000100%20:28
84M. GrabovskiC112202100061%16:20

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • hometeem

    any chance naz gets bumped to 1st line

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark

    You’re right, of course, but the real problem is that Komi is no longer even ‘top seven.’  There’s no way he should be starting ahead of Franson, or even Holzer or Fraser.

    I know, I know… the contract.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lee Thompson

    So getting back to my original point, Komi had a game where there were no glaring errors.  No embarrasing giveaways.  No players snuck by him.  He was physical (In fact, he’s our only physical defenceman.).  So, when he finishes +3 on the night, and accomplishes what I mentioned above, then he had a great game.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob’s your uncle

    Oh, I recall the mothersucking, sock cucking post, I’m just wondering if Discus or whatever can just randomly delete some archives. I know they’re not all there.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    Agreed…but he should not be starting ahead of Franson…IMHO.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    there must be some reasoning behind it.  RC doesnt care how much someone is making

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    loops played the left didnt he?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lee Thompson

    I’m not sure the love in for Franson.  I have nothing against the guy, but there’s a reason he’s always on the outside looking in.  You could argue that his problem has been a contractual issue, or a a vet vs. rook argument, but how would you then explain guys like Kostka and Gardiner?  Franson must not be doing something right.  Perhaps its a dressing room issue?  Perhaps it’s just that he’s not as good as some of you think. 

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark

    I’ll let Wilbur’s post speak for me, re: Komi, and rely on a dictionary for the definition of ‘great.’

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    I don’t know how good he is. I do know he was good enough to play top 4 minutes in NASH on a defensive team but then again they had Weber and Suter. So what would you do with him?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    agree, somethin has to give, i dont think its because komi is a vet or moneys owed thing either

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    but they let him go for a bag of pucks

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    Um…The cost of having the Leafs pay Lombardi’s multi-million dollar salary while he wasn’t playing…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark

     Whatever the problem is, it doesn’t show on the ice.  Franson would have to do a lot wrong there to be of more limited use than Komi.  On the evidence I’ve seen he’s far better.  He’s also younger and has the potential to improve, which Komi no longer does.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    which is sweet fuck all, ummmm

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lee Thompson

    Franson seems to have the body you look for in a defencman.  He’s not a deft skater, but he’s pretty good for a big man.  He’s got a good hard slap shot, but he has problems getting it off because he’s not fast enough to beat the screens.  So, if he’s not adding offense to our lineup (he’s not going to beat out any of Phaneuf, Liles, Kostka, or Gardiner for a power play spot), then he has to be a shutdown guy.  If I’m looking for a shutdown guy, I’m probably going to reach for Komi, who also gives me some jam, and adds character to the dressing room.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    Sorry, I’m not understanding your point. The Leafs paid Lombo over 5 million. NASH didn’t have to pay him 5 Million. Basically, they traded Franson for millions of dollars. Money they didn’t have. Pretty much obvious to the entire hockey world.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lee Thompson

    Alright boys….  Good debate.  I’m off to bed.  Have a good night.  I’m sure we’ll have plenty of opportunity to debate this in the coming months.  But hometeem is right…  Something has to give.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lee Thompson

    Wilbur – Can’t you make a point without trying to make someone feel stupid?  Cause that’s what I got from your post as well.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wilbur

    So, should we trade him rather than have a 24 year old rot in the press box? If so is his value higher if he plays the next 20 games or if he sits in the press box? I don’t know. Glad I don’t have to make these decisions…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lee Thompson

    Later guys

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    sorry but teams dont sell quality top 4 def for 5 mill since ballard

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mattmark

    If K.’s greatest contribution to the team is in the dressing room, convert him to team cheerleader and leave him there.  We’re only in a position to evaluate what we can see on the ice, and on that basis he gets a failing grade every time, no matter how flattering the plus-minus may look on a particular night.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Baileym_22

    Fully agree with Lee.
    Not sure what game you watches but including the penalty Komi made 2 bad plays the entire game and the 2nd really wasn’t that bad. He has CLEARLY improved his skating, is no doubt a good guy in the locker room, is more than capable of standing up for his team mates and IMO is going to continue improving his game in any way RC asks him to.
    Not his fault Burke over paid him btw. For me that’s the only thing I dislike about Komi.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hometeem

    i get the feelin komi is bein showcased this year, but thats what i though fo r the last 20 games last year too

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)