Game Tape: 11 minutes to build on in Boston

Game Tape: 11 minutes to build on in Boston

by -
216

To watch the whole second period, start at 1:09:29. The Leafs do their best work between the 13 minute mark (1:25:00ish) and the 2 minute mark of the period.

Some notes:

– The period starts off with Clarkson and Iginla dropping the mitts. PJ Stock’s point about this bout waking up the Leafs seems like a former fighter making stuff up about a momentum change that didn’t happen. In the few minutes after the fight, there was only one decent hit (from JvR, trying to get Marchand back), a couple of poor breakouts by the Leafs, and two consecutive icings with Bodie, McLaren and Smithson out on the ice.

– Definitely worth noting Phaneuf’s hits, one at 16:40 on Reilly Smith and the other at 16:12 on Paille. He had a great period in just about every respect. Also take note of his play at 13:15. Phaneuf rubbed Lucic off the puck behind the net, skated the puck into some space, and led a streaking Kessel with a good pass on the right side for a good transition breakout.

– Phaneuf was really working at this point in the game to try to make something happen. After Kessel took that shot off that rush, Phaneuf was roving across high slot area and almost got caught along with the three forwards when the rebound off of Kessel’s shot took a crazy bounce. Phaneuf fell next to the boards, springing a 2 on 1 briefly, but Phaneuf showed great hustle in getting back and laying out to take away the pass option. Lucic pulled up for a half slap shot and clipped the cross bar.

– The following shift, with around 13 minutes left, the Leafs started to make their inroads. Gardiner and Franson did a good job holding their own blueline while the forwards (Kadri, Kulemin and Lupul) were struggling to get the puck moving through the neutral zone. Eventually, Franson jumped on a broken play in the neutral zone and sprung Lupul through the middle. Lupul pulled an outside inside move around Chara and tried a fancy pass rather than taking a shot there (Note: maybe Rask was thinking of this player later on when Lupul was streaking down the boards and caught him short side). Kadri-Kulemin-Lupul had a good shift of cycling following that chance.

– Around the 12 minute mark, Ashton, Clarkson and McClement came over the boards fed off of this shift, as they managed to keep the pressure on the Bruins. Eventually, Boston got the puck out to center ice and got a chance to switch up their forwrads, but the exhausted Chara and Hamilton were still stuck out there as the Leafs cycled around against tired legs. Eventually the Leafs’ unit had to peel and change, at which point Chara and Hamilton finally got off around 10:30. The shots were 7-4 Leafs at the 10-minute mark.

– Phaneuf led another nice breakout at 7:50. At end of a long shift, he picked up the puck behind the Leaf net, saw Boston was changing, generated some speed, and found Kulemin down the right side before peeling for a change.

– Pretty dumb play by Clarkson following that breakout. Around 7:40, Clarkson flew in as the third forward and fell into some Bruins rather than stopping on the puck in front. That led to a good chance for Bergeron as the Bruins came down on Gardiner and Franson with a late-arriving backecheck.

– McClement won the defensive zone draw after that, Gardiner pushed the puck up the wall to McClement, who won the battle on the wall against Campbell to advance to Ashton. After a bit of a hiccup, Ashton got the puck in deep. Clarkson, Ashton and McClement worked some good cycling. Gardiner made a smart pinch down the wall to continue the cycle in this sequence.

– Good wheels and pressure by Raymond forced an icing at 5:50. Following an offensive zone faceoff win by Kadri – always good when you can get a draw win, but the Bruins had Kelly kicked out and Kadri beat Soderberg – the Leafs worked a short cycle before a giveaway from Kessel backed them up. Phaneuf went D to D with Gunnarsson, who sent the puck to Kadri up the left wall. Kadri took a big hit to get the puck back down deep for more cycle time for him, Lupul and Kessel around the five minute mark.

– On that next spell of offensive zone time, Kessel got a good look in the slot after coming out from behind the net, and Franson hit the post on a point shot. There were three good plays to hold the blueline by Phaneuf in order to keep this cycle alive. Eventually Kadri got tired and peeled for a change, leaving Lupul stranded, and Boston recovered the puck.

– The Bruins moved up ice at this point ?and Iginla broke into the zone. Franson took a good angle, bodied Iginla, then made a great poke check on Lucic to send Kulemin on his way. The Leafs got puck deep, and Kulemin, McClement and Clarkson established another decent forecheck and cycle.

– Kulemin made two good puck retrieval plays on this shift by keeping his legs moving and playing smart. He intercepted a clearance opportunity for Iginla on the left board. Then, over on the right board at the blueline, while supporting for a pinching Ranger, Kulemin landed a hit on Krejci and kept the puck in. Clarkson dished to McClement for a good chance to the side of the net seconds later.

– The TV timeout gave Carlyle the chance to go back to McClement and Clarkson, but with Ashton this time. McClement won the draw and more good cycle time followed. A good stick by Ranger held the blueline at 3:44, and the Leafs finished four or five hits in succession on this shift.

– Ranger’s second good stick poke of the shift at 3:15 prevented Loui Eriksson from driving around him right in on net. Eriksson probably shouldn’t have been afforded as much space as he was, but it was a good play nonetheless to prevent Eriksson from taking it backhand to forehand for a point blank scoring chance on Reimer. Ranger then intercepted a pass and flipped the puck to the board for Lupul to pick up, at which point Lupul went on his rush and scored.

– Kadri, Raymond and Kulemin maintained the momentum the very next shift. Kadri won the draw, Phaneuf found Kulemin down the right, and the Leafs enjoyed an extended cycle and put a good amount of rubber at the net.

– The Leafs looked on the verge of taking this game over right until JvR’s double minor penalty sunk them. There’s just no reason for him to have his stick up in Boychuk’s face there.

Takeaways:

– There were a ton of different variations of forward lines in this spell (Lupul-Kadri-Kessel, Raymond-JvR-Kessel, Lupul-Kadri-Kulemin; Ashton-McClement – Clarkson, more I’m not remembering), but the common thread was simplification of their game, moving their feet, and more hard-played north-south hockey. Only workmanlike efforts are going to get the Leafs through this next stretch.

– One thing that might be worth revisiting for the start of Wednesday’s game is Ashton – McClement – Clarkson as line three. I think I’d go Raymond – JvR – Kessel/Lupul – Kadri – Kulemin as well, but those top two lines are going to be a constant source of blending I would imagine. Probably not worth talking about.

– Phaneuf was awesome: moving the puck well, finishing big hits, and holding the blueline. Anybody calling for his head for the play late in the game when he didn’t recover the puck with a few seconds left is completely insane. Correct me if I’m wrong, but seems like it’s been a long time since Phaneuf has conceded a goal in his matchup at even strength.

– Gardiner and Franson drove play really well in this game.

– Ranger actually had a pretty good game if you ignore the calamity of him falling all over Reimer, pretty much solely creating the game winning goal. There’s just something about this guy… there’s a lot to like about him, but when he screws up he makes it count.

One link this morning: A good read from James Mirtle on “The Leafs still searching for a complete game.”

Alec Brownscombe is the founder of MapleLeafsHotStove.com, where he has written daily about the Leafs since September of 2008. He was also the editor of the 2009-12 Maple Leafs Annuals. You can contact him at [email protected]
142 comments
Alec Brownscombe
Alec Brownscombe moderator

Anthony's notebook now, or make everyone wait?

theacs1966
theacs1966

@4evrblue Why did he have to clear waivers and SMithson didn't?  Or did he?

Cameron19
Cameron19

@dlb eh My opinion of him hasn't really changed.  He's a top 4 defender who CAN play in the big role on the top pair on occasion.  My feeling is that he's probably generally under-valued by us as fans, because we largely see him playing a little beyond his skill-set. At the end of the day though, the writing has been on the wall for him for some time. He's a left-handed guy on a team full of left-handed D, and with many more similarly skilled players on the way up. .  

mcloki
mcloki

@Burtonboy So let's say that the experiement of Gardiner on the rights is officially closed. Franson-Gardiner set. They look great together. They make some mistakes but let them learn together. They will be fantastic.

Komas Taberle
Komas Taberle

@4evrblue 

So many memories and stories told to me by my parents.

Both of my Scottish  grandfathers, great uncles and uncles served, some died in duty but most survived.

My uncle was in the SAS from year 1 of WW2 survived and made it a career, his boss in WW2 was the actor David Niven and his commander was Ian Fleming of James Bond fame.

He died in his late 80s, but he used to come over to Canada for a visit every year, go out with my brother who was single at the time and have a great time with the ladies who were sometimes 40 years younger than him.

He used to do 500 push ups and 500 sit ups before breakfast every morning, and do deep breathing into his late 80s

He was a true hero, who fought behind enemy lines in all his active duty.

I remember them all this day and thank them from the bottom of my heart, we would not be here if it wasn't for them and their brothers in arms.

phaneufoundlander
phaneufoundlander

@4evrblue incredible....we are so fortunate just be to be on here today typing....poor bastards went through hell

theacs1966
theacs1966

@4evrblue Of course there are the 180 ( I think) Canadians who died in Afghanistan.  I think of them not as a sacrifice, but as a waste, we should not be fighting America's wars, thank God, or Jean Chretien, we didn't go into the clusterfuck of Iraq.  I don't feel those Canadians died in Afghanistan to keep me safe.  They were just wasted, a lot of them from friendly fire.

theacs1966
theacs1966

@4evrblue I remember my Mom's Brother who was a navigator in a Lancaster Bomber.  He was shot down after bombing Peenemunde, he survived, wasn't captured and made it back to Allied forces.  He died of an asthma attack, a few years later.  I also remember my Dad's Cousin , who was shot down in his fighter, and is buried in Hamburg.  I'm too young to have known either, but I've heard many stories about them.

Dan39
Dan39

@Bruffins @wiski He is the captain though, he rightfully is held to a high standard re effort through the full 60 by the media. 

It's difficult for them to critique his performance over the whole game though - doesn't fit into short, easily understood and digested pieces for radio/TV, which is why this medium is so useful.

phaneufoundlander
phaneufoundlander

@mcloki @Burtonboy I thought Reilly and Gards were exceptional as well on the PP....gonna be 2 gems back there manning the point for a long time to come

Burtonboy
Burtonboy

@mcloki @Burtonboy Leafs have to find a way to get Rielly back into the line up as well . Would not be surprised to see a d man traded

Cameron19
Cameron19

@dlb eh @Cameron19 Yes, he's kind of like Grabo in that we're not moving him down the roster because we already have options there.  Unlike Grabo, he hasn't priced himself off the roster yet though.  We won't move him until we have an upgrade for him.  For example, if Girardi signs here in the summer, or if we make a trade for a defender to pair with Phaneuf. 

-

Phaneuf - Girardi

Gardiner - Franson

Fraser - Rielly


mcloki
mcloki

@phaneufoundlander @mcloki @Burtonboy We're close top having an effective PP now. I liked the thought of having Phaneuf sit infront of the net. Then again anyone that can tip in a Franson wrist pass should be infront of the net. 

mcloki
mcloki

@phaneufoundlander @mcloki @Burtonboy They are a joy to watch. There was one PP where it was Gards, Kadri and Reilly passing the puck around like pros and I though to myself. This is just a glimpse of what the future holds and it looked great. 

theacs1966
theacs1966

@dlb eh @phaneufoundlander I'm no where near smart enough to have the answers.  But after 12 years, Scores of dead on all sides and no clear winner, war was not the answer.  Perhaps in Oct/11 if they send in Drones to kill Osama and mullah Omar it would have been much better.  It makes me crazy to hear of another dead Canadian.

theacs1966
theacs1966

@Yaknowwhat @Alec Brownscombe @theacs1966 Yes they did.  It was for them that I made it.  Don't you think those families would rather not lost a family member?  Their deaths were in vain, nothing changed, they died for nothing.  I never, never said anything bad about the soldiers, they have no choice, but if it was my family I'd be pissed if my family died is such a useless war.  A war without end an no winner.  It's not disrespectful at all to point out that they need not have died.  How is that disrespectful?  If I don't stand up to your high ideals or share your enthusiasm for war, too bad.  Don't reply then.

theacs1966
theacs1966

@rustynail @Alec Brownscombe @theacs1966 @Airfreshener @Yaknowwhat @4evrblue It's exactly the day to discuss this.  If we, remember today that all war is waste, death and pain, not to mention the economic's of it, and it means we don't do it again unless it is absolutely necessary, that it is the perfect day for it.  I want to see fewer dead CAnadians to remember in the future.

theacs1966
theacs1966

@Alec Brownscombe @Yaknowwhat @theacs1966 @4evrblue Thank you.  It was not a critique of the soldiers themselves.  but of our govt. to blindly follow the American into war.  When we saw what we were in for in Iraq, Jean Chretien wisely said no, and because of that, many Canadians are alive today.

theacs1966
theacs1966

@jcg_4 @theacs1966 @Yaknowwhat @4evrblue Fair enough, but then lets invade Iran.  They stone women there, Pakistan too.  Where does it stop?  How many Afghan's died to make this change?  And how long will it last after we leave?

Airfreshener
Airfreshener

@theacs1966 @Yaknowwhat @4evrblue They died for you and me and everyone else. Doesn't matter why they went, they laid their lives on the line and paid the ultimate price. THATS what you take out of today.

jcg_4
jcg_4

@theacs1966 @Yaknowwhat @4evrblue before we went in there, people were being stoned, beheaded or otherwise punished in public stadiums. the fact that this no longer occurs is one example of change that was brought by our forces.

theacs1966
theacs1966

@Yaknowwhat @theacs1966 @4evrblue Give your head a shake.  I was not saying anything bad about the soldiers.  They were wasted, by our govt. for NOTHING.  To follow your argument, we should tomorrow, invade, Syria, East Sudan, The Congo, Ivory Coast, Pakistan, because all of those places have terrorist, human rights abuses and the Taliban..  Might as well throw in Egypt and Libya.   Yes our country wasted 180 young Canadian lives for nothing.  Afghanistan still has terror, taliban, and human right abuses, inspite of the wasteful sacrifice of our young people.  That should piss you off more than anything.  If you think it is so important why didn't you join up and fight over there?  I wouldn't send my kids over there to die for nothing. It's not the soldiers fault, they went and did what they were ordered to do.  IT was a failure of our govt and military leaders to join in this war.  180 of us are dead, 10's of thousands of innocent Afghanistan's are dead because of this invasion and occupation.  Did we win yet?

theacs1966
theacs1966

@Yaknowwhat @theacs1966 @4evrblue No one in Afghanistan was a threat to us.  We don't owe are freedom to those that died over there, because the reason you give are too simplistic.  Of course we invade, we get Osama, and Mullah Omar, but the AMerican let them escape, then we became an occupying force, killing innocent Afghans, I was not critiquing the soldiers, but the reason they were sacrificed.  Get off your high horse and learn little nuance.  IT's not always as black and white as you'd like it to be.  So after 12 yrs of war, what have those 180 dead Canadians done?  Other than you lofty ideals, what did they die for?  Afghanistan is as fucked up as they day we arrived.  Did they bring freedom to Afghanistan?  I don't think so, hence it was a waste of our precious youth, when in the end we got nothing done.