Maple Leafs Systems – The Penalty Kill

Maple Leafs Systems – The Penalty Kill

252

There isn’t much I can add to the powerplay analysis that wasn’t in the write up by JP Nikota describing the Leafs use of the 1-3-1. They adopted this system in 2012-13 while more teams have incorporated the formation throughout the NHL.

This may be the same reason Randy Carlyle has kept the penalty killing system intact for the last two seasons.

More relevant in 2013-14 is the severe drop off in the success of killing penalties, a part of the ’12-13 Leafs that excelled while sitting at the top of the standings and helping propel the Buds into their first playoffs appearance of the post-lockout era.

The drop off is indeed staggering and lacking any systematic explanation.

1 - Leafs 2012-13 PK

2 - Leafs 2013-14 PK

The trend is getting ugly here.

After analyzing a tonne of video in an effort to identify differences between seasons, it’s time for the Occam’s Razor approach, with the likeliest culprit being the sheer increase in the amount of penalties amassed and outlined by Cam Charron over at Leafs Nation. Taking more penalties is indicative of underlying possession issues, of not having the puck and picking up a penalty to try to regain possession.

There’s a warning sign right there about the effect of not having the puck for long periods at even strength, 5v5 or 4v4. Lack of discipline may not be the main cause; the lack of puck possession is more likely to generate an increase in minor penalties.

Before getting into the analysis of the overall system, let’s look at some games from ’12-13. The focus is on two items here: the zone entry and the Leafs passive formation, and the forward’s interaction/interchangeable nature when the Sabres set up.

Each forward covers up in the middle/slot while the other engages the puck carrier at the point and on the side boards.

Against the Washington Capitals here, the focus is on zone entry and the difficulty the Caps have getting into the zone. Some of that is the penalty killing forecheck in the neutral zone, and some ineptitude of the Capitals breakout rushing the puck up ice.

Toronto lines up three players along the blueline with a roaming forechecker attempting to disrupt the breakout. Also worth noting here is also an aggressive approach in the neutral zone, making entry into the zone very difficult. Forcing the opposition to bobble the puck on entry or making entry itself difficult has obvious positives in killing the clock.

Boston has struggled with the man-advantage, but the focus is on the slot man here on setup and how he’s able to break away from the penalty killer at the top of the pyramid in the slot for an extra chance in close. Jay McClement is locked on to the shooter at the point while the Bruins slot man drops to the top of the crease for an attempt.

With the abundance of scoring talent to put out as a powerplay unit, Tampa Bay also moves back to an overload on their second unit. An overload formation is when the defensemen line up at the top of the zone and three forwards form a triangle on the one side of the ice, as seen here via the Blue Seat Blogs. It’s easy for teams to set up into the 1-3-1 by dropping the one defenseman to the half boards. Most teams have used the overload and are now switching that up to the 1-3-1 or a variation of that formation.

Even Toronto reverts to an overload when they are retrieving loose pucks on the powerplay; that is, dropping the player back to the point while the three forwards fight to regain possession of the puck and once again set up the 1-3-1.

Below, around the one minute mark, the Lightning demonstrate creating separation by drawing out the roaming forward before a quick pass off. Tyler Bozak is drawn out really high before the pass is sent down to the right side, where the winger is able to step into a shot on goal.

3 - PK Separation

Here’s the video sequence.

PENALTY KILLING SYSTEM – Czech Press

Here’s how the Leafs (and Marlies) approach penalty killing. Let’s start with the zone entry.

The best description of the system stems from the great resource Hockey Plays and Strategies by Ryan Walter and Mike Johnston, who named it the ‘Czech Press.’

4 - Leafs NZ 1-3 passive PK

The forward locks up the right wing with a rover up front. Both teams seem to be retreating into the zone and aren’t aggressively forechecking as much, ensuring there’s coverage in case they take the blueline while forcing the powerplay team to dump the puck behind them or skate it up the sides and in.

This is the look from 2012-13 with the formation staying consistent in 2013-14.

5 - NZ 1-3 retreating PK

If there’s one noticeable difference between seasons, it’s the reduced tendency of roaming for the lead penalty killing forward. The effect was more noticeable in ’12-13, when the forward would lead and engage the puck carrier. In ’13-14, the forward stays firm in formation.

6 - NZ 1-3 1314

A retreating box works best against teams that like to dump the puck into the zone due to the space afforded by the defensemen at the line. In general, it will allow a greater amount of zone entries, limit the middle of the ice, push opponents to the side, and limit cross-ice passes.

There’s a moment in the video against the Capitals where they try to isolate the puck carrier similar to a closing of a pincer when the Capitals forwards bobble the zone entry.

7 - Envelope PK forecheck

When a team does finally get into the zone and sets up with the new sexy 1-3-1 formation as described above, the Leafs‘ counter is to ensure there is always a man in the middle of the ice with an active stick. Once any forward abandons that spot to engage somewhere else in the zone, the other forward immediately occupies that space.

It looks like this below, where the puck is passed across to the point and the center occupies the slot the winger has vacated. Having a man in that spot always takes away the direct point shot, especially if the forward takes away the point very quick.

If at all possible, the goal is to regain possession and clear the zone, whether by a clearing event or skating it out into center ice before dumping it the length of the ice.

8 - Czech Press

Placing an imaginary triangle – from the slot forward to the defensemen, with the other forward engaging on the strong side – illustrates how the set up and mechanics operate.

9 - Leafs czech press formation

A variety of rules apply when down a man; common sense items like having an active stick, outworking the powerplay units and getting off for a line change at every opportunity, while maintaining awareness of their surroundings.

This one, however, is a must.

10 - nobighits

Let’s see how all of this has been executed in 2013-14.

This first video is of the second game of the season against the Philadelphia Flyers, where the Leafs allowed one goal in seven powerplay opportunities. There are four different forward pairings [James Van Riemsdyk, Dave Bolland (and Bolland with Nik Kulemin) – Tyler Bozak, Jay McClement – Mason Raymond, Troy Bodie] in the sequences and they each play the slot as diagramed above.

The late November game against the Washington Capitals was interesting to note because of the ‘shadow’ Randy Carlyle placed to neutralize the presence of Alexander Ovechkin, changing the dynamic of the penalty kill from a 5v4 to a makeshift 4v3 with the puck and formation out of whack. The Leafs forwards break away from the traditional replacement of space in the slot and have a stationary forward patrolling that lone area. Having the flexibility to change things up adds a dynamic that can’t be spotted easily by advanced scouting and would require in-game adjustments by opposition coaching staffs.

A few nights later, the Pittsburgh Penguins used three powerplay goals to creep back into the game after the Leafs ran up a 4-1 score. Yes, yes, there were third period shenanigans that contributed to the contest; however, the penalty kill let them down.

The slot man formation is just as evident here.

These are the Pittsburgh powerplay goals in that game; two while playing 5v4 and the third on a two-man advantage with a bullet of a shot.

A systematic explanation of the Leafs penalty killing isn’t fully available to explain the dramatic drop off. There isn’t enough of a systematic change from what made the units successful in ’12-13.

The bigger issue stems from the problem plaguing Toronto in general, their play at even strength leading to a significantly higher amount of penalties,

The powerplay and penalty killing units aren’t a weak spot here. The causes are much greater than any systematic breakdown.

To start figuring out where, it’s important to look at what is happening in the complete game.

Issues that need to be address begin in the defensive zone and continue in the approach to the offensive and neutral zone forecheck.

****************************************

Thanks for following along in this systems series.

Follow Gus Katsaros on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/KatsHockey

158 comments
Bon Scott was a Leaf fan
Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

Just out of curiosity....would anyone trade Rielly (by himself or as part of a package) for a 1C if there was a deal to be had...say for someone the likes of a Duchene or similar??

peterbleafs
peterbleafs

Good for Phaneuf, a few games rest and he is ready to go.  Im gonna miss both those games anyways.  Stupid travel.

mcloki
mcloki

Kopitar what a goal.

mcloki
mcloki

Livefyre a twitchy tonight. But you can hear how the Habs fans influence the refs.

DeclanK
DeclanK moderator

Toronto’s embattled mayor Rob Ford and NHL team the Toronto Maple Leafs were among Canada’s top subjects on Facebook this year. The social network released the info on national and global statistics as part of its year in review. There was some duplication between the most-discussed topics in the United States and the ones here in Canada; the Boston Marathon bombings, the Royal Baby and twerking pop star Miley Cyrus all made both lists. 


1. MAPLE LEAFS The Buds topped the list of subjects among Canadian Facebook users. Who can forget the team’s thrilling (but short) playoff run? Although the Leafs fell to Original Six rivals the Boston Bruins in the first round, the first post-season action in nine years captivated the country. 


http://www.thestar.com/life/technology/2013/12/10/rob_ford_maple_leafs_among_most_popular_facebook_topics_in_2013.html

mcloki
mcloki

Montreal moves the puck with a sense of urgency.

Dangle_My_Berries
Dangle_My_Berries

what i don't get is that we have a stronger team then the habs.....yet, they manage to play a competitive game, and we struggle to do the same 

mcloki
mcloki

Just started watching. LA looks quick

Radar O'Rielly
Radar O'Rielly

In the ass by Shannahan.  Can we at least get a reach around??

Bon Scott was a Leaf fan
Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

Just in from work.  Cooking up some beans and weanies once again...but this time I remembered the bacon and onion.

Loading the vape as she cooks (good thing I re-charged my vape).

Bring on Los Angeles & St. Louis!!

Cameron19
Cameron19

As hard as it is to listen to Kypreos claim that management is questioning Phil and Dion, and as much as I agree that it would be nice if the media focused on something positive with the team once and a while, I have to admit that management is probably right to be asking that question.  I believe we can win with Dion, but that it will be incredibly hard to find a center for the top line as long as Kessel is a Leaf. Having said that, this is a question that should have been asked last year, before signing Bozak and pleading with Phil to stay...

loomx
loomx

@Bon Scott was a Leaf fan I'd definitely do everything possible to keep him by trying to trade Franson or Gardiner but if it was for a top C or stud Dman I'd definitely pull the trigger.

peterbleafs
peterbleafs

No, never...because no one would ever offer a Duschene for a Rielly.

Cameron19
Cameron19

@mcloki It just appears that way because they aren't incredibly, painfully slow. 

ingy56
ingy56

@TheCanucksnaphook THAT'S MY BOY CANCILLLO...GOOD CANADIAN KID...NOT GONNA PUT UP WITH THAT NONSENSE...TWO THUMBS UP ...LET'S GO!

loomx
loomx

@Cameron19 Only morons pin the blame on the top players when they're the only ones who have been doing their jobs(and the goalies). Just because Phil is shy, people automatically assume he's not a leader when really, he scores at a consistent rate no matter what and since Carlyle got here has stepped up and improved his two-way game. The team sorely lacks depth and good quality bottom6/bottom pairing players. So called "leadership" is overrated. Phaneuf, Lupul, Clarkson, McClement, Bolland. This team has plenty of leadership, not enough skill.

PepTalk
PepTalk

@Cameron19 Why will it be difficult to ind a top line center while Kessel is here?

Burtonboy
Burtonboy

@Cameron19 You actually believe there is credibility to what Kypreos is saying ?

mcloki
mcloki

We think too much on the PP. And need to move.

Bon Scott was a Leaf fan
Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

@peterbleafs

Haha!!  Peter, I remember my very first post here at MLHS where I divulged that I puff weed...and you chimed in (almost immediately) giving me ROYAL shit for bringing it up....saying I should stick to hockey talk only.  I'll never forget that moment.  Then, other potheads chimed in as time when by.....and viola, we have an entire segment of MLHS that are potheads.  Whodathunkit!!

Bon Scott was a Leaf fan
Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

@peterbleafs

Short form for vaporizer.  It's a contraption that heats up my herb....but only to a certain point such that it releases the THC but nothing else (no bad stuff).  God's gift to potheads such as myself.

Cameron19
Cameron19

@Bruffins @Cameron19 Seguin, and before him, Thornton. I agree with the 3 strong scoring lines theory, but again, with Kessel eating up 8 million, and Bozak a potential mainstay because of him, that will be difficult to achieve for a number of reasons. 

loomx
loomx

@Bruffins @Cameron19 Leafs missed the boat on Mike Richards. Proven leader and a skilled C who can keep up with and shutdown top players. Irrelevant though since Carlyle still would've put Bozak on the top line.

Cameron19
Cameron19

@PepTalk @Cameron19 Cap space is a big issue, and the distribution of assets.  Even if a center became available, it would cripple us to pay the price to acquire said player.

Cameron19
Cameron19

@TheCanucksnaphook @Cameron19 Leadership isn't even as important to me as the basic structure of our team.  We saw in the playoffs last year that Phil is an under-rated leader, and can definitely lead by example when it matters.  But structurally, we basically are trying to put together the strongest group of scoring wingers in the league, leaving us little money for centers, and always having to hope for the best defensively. 

Cameron19
Cameron19

@Burtonboy @Cameron19 Yes.  It's a serious question to ask, even though he's only reporting it to stir up further controversey while times are tough. 

Cameron19
Cameron19

@.JVR. @Cameron19 He averages 8.7 because he has bogus retirement years tagged on to the end of the deal.  He makes over 10 for the bulk of the contract. 

.JVR.
.JVR.

@Cameron19


Actually, Crosby averages $8.7 million, but is making $12 million this season and for the next two, before his annual salary begins to drop.

Cameron19
Cameron19

@TheCanucksnaphook @Cameron19 Yep, over time they will.  Weber already does, and Kovalchuk, Parise and Suter are/were in that territory too.  Crosby averages around 12 

Cameron19
Cameron19

@PepTalk @Cameron19 @Bruffins Meh, I don't think he overpaid for Kessel or Lupul at all.  Clarkson is overpaid, but he paid market price for him and Bozak.  Dion is worth 7 million. That's just the reality of the new cap system and the fact that we're a Canadian team with massive taxes. 

-

He definitely fucked up not buying out Liles and wasting a compliance buyout on Komisarek. 

PepTalk
PepTalk

@Cameron19 @PepTalk @Bruffins I think that overall Nonis has done a mediocre job at CAP management. I think that he could have saved a million on the Kessel contract. Grossly overpaid Clarkson. Slightly overpaid Lupul. Overpaid Bozak by half a million at least. Now he'll likely pay Dion north of $7M.

loomx
loomx

@Cameron19 @loomx @Bruffins Besides, you don't need Crosby and Malkin on this team just to have a shot at a cup. The strength is on the wings, so make the C's good, solid, two-way players. Richards-Bolland-Bozak-McClement looks damn good with what we have on the wing.

Cameron19
Cameron19

@ingy56 @mcloki I love how people talk about these things as if every other team doesn't already have that space. We aren't gaining anything, we're just catching up to other teams. 

ingy56
ingy56

@mcloki ...and another half million from not paying Scrivens and Frattin

mcloki
mcloki

And we get an extra 2 from tucker and Armstrong contracts.

loomx
loomx

@Cameron19 @Bon Scott was a Leaf fan @PepTalk As if trading Kessel is the ONLY options. Maybe if we didn't pay premium prices for inferior centres(Bozak), oft-injured wingers(Lupul), and grinders(Clarkson), there wouldn't even be a discussion of cap issues.

Bon Scott was a Leaf fan
Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

@Cameron19 @Bon Scott was a Leaf fan @PepTalk

Sure, but then your left trying to get a top flight winger (which would be easier to acquire than a 1C, mind you....but still).

I'd rather package Gardiner, one of our goalies, another one of our D, and some prospects and picks for a 1C.....and see if anyone bites.