Game In 10: Game 70, Leafs at Panthers

by on March 13, 2012 in Post Game - 1,609 Comments

Game In 10: Game 70, Leafs at Panthers
Share

Box Score | Ice Time | Recap

“This is like watching that movie The Fugitive, with the train wreck in slow motion. It just doesn’t seem to stop!”
-Joe Bowen



1 - The Leafs are 30-32-8; that’s 15 losses in their last 17 and if you weren’t already, start questioning what this group is made of. The result may be best as far as the draft goes, but this team doesn’t seem capable of fighting its way out of the tailspin its currently mired in. That’s concerning regardless of the consequent high draft position.

2 - The scoring opens after James Reimer struggles to find the rubber on a dribbler from the point. Mike Komisarek way over-pursued for a hit up the sideboards, taking himself out of position and losing the race back to the net. An awful play from the blueline’s elder statesman/press box regular, but Reimer didn’t do much to bail him out.

The second goal wasn’t Reimer’s fault per se, but in its buildup it looked like he was watching a different game than the rest of us. Reimer’s play between the goals concerned me more than the goals themselves. He’s really struggled with his puck tracking since returning from his concussion.

3 - After the Leafs went down early, Jay Rosehill ate a few punches from Krys Barch, left the ice bloodied, but kept his feet throughout. At least you’re not in Afghanistan, Rosie.

4 - Carter Ashton was the Leafs most noticeable member tonight. He brought some strong play down low, tossing Keaton Ellerby into the boards in the first, and showed some net drive off the wing. Shawn Matthias made Ashton answer for his physical play in the third and he showed no hesitation in backing it up, even if he looked a little like a fish out of water in the fisticuffs. Good showing from the kid.

5 - Kessel and Bozak alongside Connolly equals a one dimensional first line. Connolly is just a passenger out there on the wing. The other two sorely miss Lupul‘s impact play, big body and net presence. Lots of fancy pants passing that led nowhere from those three. It wasn’t until MacArthur briefly replaced Connolly and put something on net that the 1st line finally found the twine on the 2-1 goal.

Connolly just seems to be playing his way towards the door at the moment.

6 – Only two goals tonight after getting shut out in the two prior, and both came off the rush. Last night it wasn’t even so much that the team is learning to use the cycle more, though that’s certainly a part of it. Through two periods tonight the pass/shot selection was absolutely mind numbing, and the Leafs don’t have enough players that can fight for the good ice in the offensive zone.

7 - The third Panther goal, which proved the winner, was another example of Dion Phaneuf giong through the motions towards the end of a shift. There was no real attempt from Kulemin to get in the shooting lane, but Phaneuf gives Kopecky free rein to position himself out front for the tip with no real attempt to tie him up. You can speculate on the reason, but Phaneuf seems to lose focus (and effort) towards the end of shifts. It seems to me the Leafs will need another big minute guy to help relieve Phaneuf of some minutes before they have a winning defence core.

8 - As for the fourth Panther goal – that’s our top pairing, everyone! Gunnarsson opts for the riskiest play imaginable to try to hit a streaking Phaneuf, who was prematurely flying the zone with vigor. Since this extended slump started, it seems the Leafs can’t get away with anything without it resulting in a face off at center ice, but that one deserved the punishment.

9 – The empty netter bothered me more than the previous four, believe it or not. The Leafs weren’t coming back, but Dion Phaneuf totally gave up on the play. That’s not the message your captain should be sending to his group in the midst of an embarrassing losing streak. Phaneuf laid an egg tonight when he should’ve been leading by example.

10 - In summary, same old shit. Galchenyuk, anyone?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • leafmealone

    That’s because we’re not a major (ie. Chicago) or struggling (ie. Carolina, Columbus) American market. Don’t worry, if we finish 3rd, we’ll actually likely draft 5th. That’s how Bettman rolls man.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lukethenuke
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    Galchenyuk and Yakupov have played together and have proven chemistry….. either pair would be awesome IMO lol

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kurt!!

    ill bite
    schenn and kadri and 2nd for edmontons 1st
    franson kuli comborne and next years 1st for jackets 1st

    boom we now have 3 top 5 picks haha

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafmealone

    Really, nobody feeling the Tebow theory? I thought I was onto something there….

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mike_84
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    If things actually went down like this I would actually rather see Burke trade down for faksa or gaunce

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mike_84

    LOL roll a Yakupov-Gal-Grigo line

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kurt!!

    Yup! its gonna happen, how can it not?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wiski

    Grigo = stefano

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafmealone

    not that any of this is likely, but IF Columbus was trading us their 1st, you would pretty much have to put Gardiner in the trade. If they only have a limited number of trading partners for Nash, but still ask a king’s ransom, I imagine it would be worse for their first overall. And as they demanded Gardiner in the Nash trade, it would be safe to assume he’s the starting point for getting their first.
    Maybe if you were willing to move our first in return for one of the top two overall you’d get a better price.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kurt!!

    meh those guys are 5 year 2nd line projects

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.twitter.com/jmckelvie McKelvie

    There’s a HUGE reason why Grigorenko is ranked 1st overall in centers and Stefanovich was ranked in the lower 2nd round.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kurt!!
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mike_84

    I wonder if Burke moves our 3rd overall pick for a NHL talent. Any ways boys have a good night

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wiski

    I`ve seen them both live and they look similar to me, I`m no expert though

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lukethenuke

    thats right folks, lukethenuke has brought back the sundin avatar haha

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.twitter.com/jmckelvie McKelvie

    Pots being stirred already boys. MacLean says Nash will end up with the Leafs if traded.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lukethenuke
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kurt!!

    I heard he was going to the KHL stright up for radulov

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.twitter.com/jmckelvie McKelvie

    Is your close buddy Captain Obvious? hahha

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.twitter.com/jmckelvie McKelvie

    Whatever the pick ends up being. Would you guys trade it for Nash?… Seems very reasonable to do it.. but fuck why can’t we just draft someone haha

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wiski

    Where are you getting the Grigo first over all stats?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kurt!!

    stright up for nash yup, see ya draft pick

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lukethenuke
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)