Joffrey Lupul: Also confounded by Leafs’ defensive system

Jonathan Bernier
LOS ANGELES, CA - MARCH 13: Anze Kopitar #11 of the Los Angeles Kings tries to knock in the puck against Jonathan Bernier #45 of the Toronto Maple Leafs at Staples Center on March 13, 2014 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Noah Graham/NHLI via Getty Images)

“We didn’t seem to be able to break the cycle, and they were using the points. We play with a lot of people down low in our zone so the points are going to be open. And yet they seemed to be getting the point shots through and a lot of tips and rebounds. Obviously something.. something was wrong there.”
– Joffrey Lupul after the 5-3 loss to St. Louis.

After the loss last night, Randy Carlyle and Joffrey Lupul both came to the conclusion that this Leafs team is tense — on account of all the recent losing — and it has hurt their starts in games by exacerbating an inability to calmly execute breakouts. After all, the team has been able to battle back in games after falling behind by a couple of goals, repeatedly, during this losing streak. Lupul said “our skill seems to take over” once the Leafs shed their “fear” and play come-from-behind hockey.

That could be one factor. But it’s also almost certainly true that opposing teams are easing off the throttle once up by a few goals. A system that fails when the game is close and the opponent is applying pressure is obviously not a working system. Not that we didn’t know this already, whether you’re looking at the outrageously — historically — bad shot or shot attempt data, or poring through some game tape.

As Gus Katsaros wrote way back in November:

[quote_box_center]Before getting right into the main points, I wanted to address the concept of the  system’s fundamentals as forcing the opponent to the perimeter (outside) and allowing shots from a greater distance.
I find that to be a slight misconception. It is natural to be in a defensive position between the puck and the net at all times, and pushing players to the outside has a more philosophical bent and is defense 101 rather than a component for which to build a system around.
Teams would be satisfied to keep players on the perimeter moving the puck without penetration into scoring areas. So the main part of a defensive system has less to do with clogging up the middle and keeping opponents to the outside, and more about regaining possession, quick ups and transition.
The word transition, bandied around by Leafs coaching and management staffs, is one of the weaker areas addressed by Randy Carlyle’s systems as we shall see.
Opponents controlling the puck leads to what Randy Carlyle dubs as “receiving,” where the defending team withstands the barrage of shots, with the hope that scoring chances are few and far between whether set up properly or not in the defensive zone.
System implementation isn’t meant to make “receiving” a typical defensive philosophy. The goal is to isolate the puck carrier, engage with (hopefully) numbers (one engaged, one support/layer), regain possession and transition to offense all while facing varying degrees of forechecking pressure.

In last night’s case, the degree of forechecking pressure was intensely high while the game was still up for grabs. The Blues are the gold standard when it comes to a heavy cycle team; as Carlyle put it, they get pucks in deep, retrieve very effectively,  play “high to low,” and crash the net. Their D is talented, mobile, and very effective at pinching down the walls. In both games versus St. Louis this season, the Leafs have been blown out of the rink before the game was half over. St. Louis is really good, but this is the NHL, and the gap between a great NHL team and an average NHL team shouldn’t be so immediately visible within 20 minutes of the game, at least not to the tune of getting out shot 40-13 and outscored 5-1 in the combined first periods of the two tilts. At a minimum, as fans we want to see the Leafs compete and earn respect, which is certainly not what happened in the first 40 minutes of last night’s game.

(Interesting thing about Carlyle: I’ve always found, in the pressers, he is capable of identifying the problems, or what the other team does well that his team doesn’t, but never of actually attributing them correctly and fixing them… a better diagnostician than a prescriber of remedy; there seems to this old-school stubbornness and a stringent belief in his way — or system — and it being all the players’ fault when it fails. It’s why he’s blaming the team being tense as the reason for these struggles rather than something systemic. When things are going poorly, a team should be able to lean on its fundamentals and strength of system, but the Leafs’ is failing them).

Many teams in the League will collapse in certain situations when defending; be it late in the game with a lead or as a scrambled reaction if something breaks down and there’s an abandonment of structure. The Leafs, however, are unique in the sense that this is what their defensive zone system is predicated on as their ‘structured’ system. As we saw on 24/7, the coaches call it the “swarm” and this is how they play from puck drop.

It doesn’t give the team a fighting chance against a team like St. Louis.

Among many, two particularly long spells in defensive zone took place in the first period at five on five, one leading to the 1-1 goal. (The first saw Leafs spent from 18:44 until 17:23, nearly a minute and a half straight, in their own zone).

There are so many examples of this every game, all season, but let’s revisit one from last night. With six minutes to go came another long spell in Leaf zone leading up to 1-1 goal (McClement, Lupul, Raymond, Gardiner, Franson on the ice). Key in on Mason Raymond. Now, he isn’t the strongest guy in puck battles on the wall nor always the best decision maker, but Raymond was so concerned about doing his part to cover the slot “in case” while the puck is behind the goalline. As a consequence, Raymond has to take  extra strides that leave him second to the puck or in a poor position to receive a pass from Gardiner. This is obviously his prescribed positioning. Finally, after one desperate chip into the neutral zone by Gardiner, the puck is back in the Leaf zone within 3 seconds, the puck goes low off the shot, back high, D to D, and Alex Steen tips the point shot.

(Note: There were also instances in this game where the Leafs were in a position to win battles on the walls or receive the pass and simply didn’t, a separate but related issue and one also in need of assessment).

Now, it’s probably true that the Leafs would have eked into the playoffs this season if Bernier was around to help them collect some points in those crucial four-point games, rather than a shaken, possibly-injured and off-his-game James Reimer. Hell, maybe they even would have received a favorable matchup against the Habs or something and gone on to win a round, but what are we ultimately talking about here? A team has to be able to withstand and diffuse strong forechecking and cycling pressure if it wants to go anywhere in the post season. If this team somehow manages to take 11 or 12 points out of their final 16, they would play Boston, and I am positive they would fare much worse than they did last May (besides the Leafs being worse this season, the Bruins are scoring far more).

Perhaps my abiding belief in the team’s talent level led me to erroneously predict the Leafs to finish 6th in in the East despite fears about Carlyle, but I do still believe there’s a lot more talent here than what’s been on display lately. There’s also unquestionably some personnel weaknesses on this roster, with some particularly disappointing developments on the backend. I also believe there is some soft play going on among this group of forwards that falls beyond Carlyle. After all, more than one single factor goes into setting records for shots against (expansion-team bad) and being bottom-3 in goals against despite great goaltending. The difficulty, come the off season, is assessing the performances of some of the Leafs’ defencemen and of their forwards in the defensive context after having watched them try to execute this system all season long.

Previous articleGame Review: Game #74, Blues 5 at Maple Leafs 3
Alec Brownscombe is the founder of, where he has written daily about the Leafs since September of 2008. He was also the editor of the 2009-12 Maple Leafs Annuals. You can contact him at [email protected]
  • Anthony Petrielli

    Good stuff. Also, frustrating. This isn’t rocket science.

  • Jmessih

    Anthony Petrielli Hey Anthony, do you think Reilly represents Canada @ World Championships this spring? Assuming things continue at this rate? I think he gets a call for sure. Outside chance of Gards going to USA as well.

  • TheGroobster

    Just want to note that Carlyle has, in the past, taken blame on himself and the coaching staff for the teams poor play.

  • Cloud09

    TheGroobster  Doesn’t mean much if they keep going back and making the same mistakes over and over again.

  • Anthony Petrielli

    Jmessih Anthony Petrielli  Need to see who doesn’t make the playoffs first but I don’t think he’ll be in the original 7 they want. Maybe after a few guys say no (which always happens) he’ll get the call though.

  • Cloud09

    Frustrating is a good way to put it. I finally bought into what the Leafs were trying to sell at training camp after a wary summer but this just shows how wrong we all were. Heads should roll, ideally from the top down. Nonis, Carlyle and unfortunately Phaneuf should be purged from this team and start with a fresh piece of paper. Leiweke has a chance this summer to try and right the ship, hopefully before they burn all the boats.

  • Jmessih

    Anthony Petrielli Jmessih Really, they usually prioritize at least one or two young guns. Also, correct Reilly cannot play AHL playoffs. So after the Leafs season is done, so is he (barring the WC)?

  • Habskilla

    All this article did for me is want Carlyle fired even more. But I know it isn’t going to happen because wants to keep his job and once you fire the coach the next person to go is the GM.

    Carlyle will be around next year. Next year we will have the same collapse. And next year is when we fire Carlyle…

  • Cloud09

    Habskilla  Only saving grace here is Nonis inherited Carlyle. Traditionally the GM gets an opportunity to bring in their own coach, and then if that doesn’t work the GM will get fired. If the Leafs miss here Carlyle has to get canned.

  • LeafsManiac

    Cloud09  I’m not the biggest Phaneuf fan, mostly due to his contract. But whether your a hater or not how can anybody think it’s possible to purge of him. We are stuck with him for a long long time, that is an absolutely terrible unmovable contract. In todays day and age it is all about cap hit and that is why personally I never seen Luongos contract that bad. But Phaneuf at 7mil, kessel at 8mil, Clarkson 5.25 man Nonis is digging himself one big hole. 
    We are stuck with the core we have they are not going anywhere, Carlyle may and I think should but I think Nonis should be gone at the end of the season as well.